Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

345
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
345

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Non-BRCA germline pathogenic variants and response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy in triple-negative breast cancer patients enrolled in a prospective clinical trial.

Breast cancer research and treatment·2026
Same author

Tumor cell specific total mRNA expression informed neural networks predicts cancer progression.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Scalable subclonal reconstruction of cancer cells in DNA sequencing data using a penalized likelihood model.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of BRCA Germline Mutation Carriers with Advanced Breast Cancer Treated with PARP (Poly ADP-Ribose Polymerase) Inhibitors: A Single-Institution Experience.

Cancers·2026
Same author

PRECISE: A Prognostic Thyrocyte-Derived Gene Signature for Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research·2026
Same author

Performance of LFSPRO prediction in TP53 mutation status for prospectively collected probands.

American journal of human genetics·2026
Same journal

Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Rituximab, Gemcitabine, and Oxaliplatin in Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Results From the Phase III, Randomized POLARGO Trial.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2026
Same journal

Biology Over Monotherapy: Mature Results From European Organisation For Research and Treatment of Cancer 22033-26033 Reaffirm Molecular Stratification, Not Treatment Sequence, Defines Prognosis in Low-Grade Glioma.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2026
Same journal

Risk Prognostication After Hypomethylating Agents Combined With Venetoclax in AML: The PRISM Risk Model.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2026
Same journal

Temozolomide Versus Radiotherapy as First-Line Therapy for Low-Grade Glioma: Mature Results of a Randomized Phase III Trial (EORTC 22033-26033/NCIC-CTG/TROG/MRC-CTU).

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2026
Same journal

Efficacy and Tolerability of Zenocutuzumab in Advanced <i>NRG1</i> Fusion-Positive Cholangiocarcinoma: Results From the eNRGy Phase II Trial.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2026
Same journal

Phase I/II Study of Sonrotoclax (BGB-11417) Monotherapy in Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma Previously Treated With Anti-CD20 Therapy and a Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

261

Validating Risk Prediction Models for Multiple Primaries and Competing Cancer Outcomes in Families With Li-Fraumeni

Nam H Nguyen1,2, Elissa B Dodd-Eaton1, Jessica L Corredor3

  • 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Bioinformatics and Computation Biology, Houston, TX.

Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
|April 3, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Risk prediction models for Li-Fraumeni syndrome show good performance using clinical data. These models, applied by genetic counselors, can improve cancer risk assessment and counseling.

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

261
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.2K

Area of Science:

  • Genetics and Genomics
  • Oncology
  • Clinical Decision Support

Background:

  • Disseminating risk prediction models into clinical practice faces barriers.
  • Research cohorts are meticulously collected, unlike real-world clinical data.
  • Demonstrating model utility with incomplete clinical data may overcome these barriers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of risk prediction models using a clinical counseling-based (CCB) cohort.
  • To assess if models developed for Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) risk prediction perform well with real-world clinical data.
  • To compare model performance against standard clinical criteria.

Main Methods:

  • A CCB cohort of 3,297 individuals across 124 families was used.
  • Genetic counselors collected family history data for LFS risk assessment.
  • The LFSPRO software suite was applied to predict TP53 mutations and cancer onset, with performance measured by AUC and O/E ratio.

Main Results:

  • For predicting deleterious TP53 mutations, an AUC of 0.78 and an O/E ratio of 1.66 were achieved.
  • The LFSPRO.MPC model predicted second cancer onset with an AUC of 0.70.
  • The LFSPRO.CS model achieved AUCs between 0.70-0.83 for predicting first primary cancers like sarcoma and breast cancer.

Conclusions:

  • Previously validated risk prediction models demonstrate good performance in a CCB cohort.
  • These models outperformed standard clinical criteria for LFS risk assessment.
  • The findings suggest that genetic counselors can utilize these mathematical models for improved risk counseling.