Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
Measurement properties of the Mental Health Literacy Scale (MHLS) validation studies: a systematic review protocol
Rouwida ElKhalil1, Mohamad AlMekkawi2, Matt O'Connor3
1Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, PO.Box:15551, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Introduction:
Mental Health Literacy (MHL) is important for improving mental health and reducing inequities in treatment. The Mental Health Literacy Scale (MHLS) is a valid and reliable assessment tool for MHL. This systematic review will examine and compare the measurement properties of the MHLS in different languages, enabling academics, clinicians and policymakers to make informed judgements regarding its use in assessments.
Methods And Analysis:
The review will adhere to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Manual for Evidence Synthesis and will be presented following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis 2020 checklist. The review will be conducted in four stages, including an initial search confined to PubMed, a search of electronic scientific databases PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, MEDLINE, Embase (Elsevier), PubMed (NLM) and ERIC, an examination of the reference lists of all papers to locate relevant publications and finally contacting the MHLS original author to identify validation studies that the searches will not retrieve. These phases will assist us in locating studies that evaluate the measurement properties of MHLS across various populations, demographics and contexts. The search will focus on articles published in English between May 2015 and December 2023. The methodological quality of the studies will be evaluated using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist, and a comprehensive qualitative and quantitative data synthesis will be performed.
Ethics And Dissemination:
Ethics approval is not required. The publication will be in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences.
Prospero Registration Number:
CRD42023430924.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Health Literacy
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
Dimensions of Health and Illness
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...

