Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Intratumoral Injection of Cisplatin for the Treatment of Isolated Mediastinal Recurrence of Lung Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2017
Restricted Net Treatment Benefit in oncology
Max Piffoux1, Brice Ozenne2, Mickaël De Backer3
1Medical Oncology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, CITOHL, Lyon, France; Direction de la Recherche Clinique et de l'Innovation, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Laboratoire MSC Matière et Systèmes Complexes, Université de Paris, CNRS UMR 7057, 75006 Paris, France.
The restricted Net Treatment Benefit (rNTB) offers a robust method for evaluating treatment effects in clinical trials, even with time restrictions and censoring. This adaptable measure provides unbiased estimates and can incorporate both survival and toxicity for a comprehensive benefit-risk assessment.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Clinical Trial Design
- Survival Analysis
Background:
- The restricted Net Treatment Benefit (rNTB) is a clinically meaningful estimand for overall treatment effect in randomized trials.
- It is particularly useful when survival endpoints with time restrictions are employed.
- rNTB interpretation does not require parametric assumptions like proportional hazards and is unbiased with independent right-censoring.
Purpose of the Study:
- To demonstrate that rNTB, representing NTB within a defined time interval, is a meaningful and adaptable measure of treatment effect.
- To evaluate the impact of various factors on rNTB estimation and power.
- To compare rNTB-derived tests with traditional log-rank tests.
Main Methods:
- A simulation study was conducted to assess the influence of delayed treatment effects, minimal clinically relevant difference thresholds, restriction time, and the inclusion of efficacy and toxicity.
- The bias introduced by right-censoring on rNTB was evaluated.
- Power comparisons were made between rNTB-derived statistical tests and log-rank tests.
Main Results:
- rNTB estimates remain unbiased even with right-censoring.
- rNTB facilitates benefit-risk ratio estimation, incorporating survival and toxicity.
- rNTB is more interpretable than NTB with censoring, as it is not dependent on follow-up duration.
- Including toxicity enhances test power when the experimental treatment is less toxic.
- rNTB-derived test power increases with longer survival and lower toxicity, and may improve with a cure rate or delayed treatment effect.
- Case applications from PRODIGE, Checkmate-066, and Checkmate-067 trials are presented.
Conclusions:
- rNTB is a valuable alternative for describing and testing treatment effects clearly, especially with restricted timeframes.
- It is particularly advantageous in scenarios with nonproportional hazards or when balancing benefit and safety.
- rNTB can be adjusted for short- or long-term survival differences and multiple prioritized outcomes.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Tumor Immunotherapy
Cancer Survival Analysis
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...

