Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2025
06:48
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
9.3K
Discipline and punishment in panoptical public goods games
Rocio Botta1, Gerardo Blanco2, Christian E Schaerer3
1Polytechnic School, National University of Asuncion, San Lorenzo, Paraguay. rbotta@pol.una.py.
Scientific Reports
|April 3, 2024
Summary
Societies face free-riding challenges in Public Goods Games (PGG). This study models compulsory PGG with panoptical surveillance, showing calibrated punishment and discipline enhance cooperation.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary Game Theory
- Sociology
- Behavioral Economics
Background:
- Public Goods Games (PGG) are threatened by free-riding, undermining cooperation.
- Existing incentive systems (rewards, punishments) show mixed results in fostering cooperation.
- Gaps exist in understanding graduated punishment's link to monitoring in PGG.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a novel mathematical model for a compulsory PGG framework under Panoptical surveillance.
- To analyze the balance between punishment severity and scope to enhance cooperative behavior.
- To integrate Foucault's theories on power and discipline with evolutionary game theory.
Main Methods:
- Developed a novel mathematical model for a compulsory Public Goods Game.
- Incorporated principles of Panoptical surveillance for universal oversight.
- Integrated evolutionary game theory with Foucault's theories of power and discipline.
Main Results:
- Demonstrated that well-calibrated punishment and discipline schemes can mitigate the free-rider dilemma.
- Showcased the effectiveness of the panoptical effect in fostering enhanced cooperation.
- Uncovered theoretical foundations for mathematical frameworks in punishment and discipline structures.
Conclusions:
- Calibrated punishment under universal surveillance is effective in promoting cooperation in PGG.
- An interdisciplinary approach is crucial for understanding and fostering cooperative evolution.
- This research provides insights into societal constructs and the dynamics of cooperation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:27Punishment
178
Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior....
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior....
178
03:20The Stanford Prison Experiment
23.2K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
23.2K
02:20Milgram's Obedience to Authority
6.4K
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
6.4K
01:08Timing and Consequences on Behavior
90
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective.
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
90
01:21Operant Conditioning
1.6K
Operant conditioning, a key concept in behavioral psychology, involves using reinforcement and punishment to alter the likelihood of a behavior being repeated. B.F. introduced this type of conditioning. Skinner focused on voluntary behaviors and the consequences that follow them, influencing whether these behaviors will be strengthened or diminished.
Reinforcement in operant conditioning can be positive or negative, both of which serve to increase the likelihood of a behavior. Positive...
Reinforcement in operant conditioning can be positive or negative, both of which serve to increase the likelihood of a behavior. Positive...
1.6K
01:24Operant Conditioning Intervention
56
Operant conditioning serves as a foundational principle in therapeutic interventions aimed at modifying maladaptive behaviors. Central to this approach is the notion that behaviors, both adaptive and maladaptive, are learned through reinforcement. By analyzing the environmental factors that reinforce problematic behaviors, clinicians can design interventions to weaken these reinforcements and replace maladaptive behaviors with healthier alternatives.
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...
56