Performance of Image-navigated and Diaphragm-navigated 3D Late Gadolinium-enhanced Cardiac MRI for the Assessment of...

Purpose To perform a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the novel image-navigated (iNAV) 3D late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac MRI imaging strategy in comparison with the conventional diaphragm-navigated (dNAV) 3D LGE cardiac MRI strategy for the assessment of left atrial fibrosis in atrial fibrillation (AF). Materials and Methods In this prospective study conducted between April and September 2022, 26 consecutive participants with AF (mean age, 61 ± 11 years; 19 male) underwent both iNAV and dNAV 3D LGE cardiac MRI, with equivalent spatial resolution and timing in the cardiac cycle. Participants were randomized in the acquisition order of iNAV and dNAV. Both, iNAV-LGE and dNAV-LGE images were analyzed qualitatively using a 5-point Likert scale and quantitatively (percentage of atrial fibrosis using image intensity ratio threshold 1.2), including testing for overlap in atrial fibrosis areas by calculating Dice score. Results Acquisition time of iNAV was significantly lower compared with dNAV (4.9 ± 1.1 minutes versus 12 ± 4 minutes, P < .001, respectively). There was no evidence of a difference in image quality for all prespecified criteria between iNAV and dNAV, although dNAV was the preferred image strategy in two-thirds of cases (17/26, 65%). Quantitative assessment demonstrated that mean fibrosis scores were lower for iNAV compared with dNAV (12 ± 8% versus 20 ± 12%, P < .001). Spatial correspondence between the atrial fibrosis maps was modest (Dice similarity coefficient, 0.43 ± 0.15). Conclusion iNAV-LGE acquisition in individuals with AF was more than twice as fast as dNAV acquisition but resulted in a lower atrial fibrosis score. The differences between these two strategies might impact clinical interpretation. ©RSNA, 2024.