Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026
Intrathecal Application of a Fluorescent Dye for the Identification of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks in Cochlear Malformation
Published on: February 29, 2020
Correction of congenital auricle deformities with ear mould: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Jincheng Huang1, Kun Zou2, Ping Yuan3
1Chengdu Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Sichuan Province, 610041, China.
Objective:
To assess the effectiveness and safety of ear moulds for congenital auricle deformities.
Methods:
Databases including Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Chinese BioMedical Literature Database (CBM) and Web of Science were systematically reviewed. Randomised controlled trials (RCT), non-randomised control trials (non-RCT), quasi-randomised control trials (quasi-RCT) and self-controlled before-after trials were also included. Data extraction was independently conducted by two authors. The Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBIN-I) was used to evaluate the risk bias. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 and chi-square tests. Effective rate, adverse reaction rate and their 95%CI were calculated. Funnel plots, Begg's test as well as sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed.
Results:
The analysis encompassed ten studies, comprising one RCT and nine self-controlled before-after trials, involving 1860 ears (1248 children). The pooled effective rate and adverse reaction rate of ear mould were 91% (95% CI: 0.87-0.94) and 9% (95%CI: 0.02-0.17), respectively. No serious adverse reactions were reported. The effective rate of ear mould intervention showed no significant difference between age at correction≤42 days group (90%, 95%CI: 0.85-0.94) and that >42 days group (93%, 95%CI: 0.83-0.99). Similarly, there was no statistical difference in the correction efficiency between duration of wearing ear mould≤30 days group (90%, 95%CI: 0.85-0.94) and that >30 days group (92%, 95%CI: 0.86-0.96). The effective rate for correcting cryptotia ear (98%, P < 0.001), cup ear (93%, P = 0.004) and prominent ear (90%, P = 0.014) was higher than that of helical rim deformity (66%).
Conclusions:
In the short term, the use of ear moulds is effective and safe in correcting congenital auricle deformities. Notably, the correction efficacy for cryptotia, cup ear and prominent ear deformities surpasses that of helical rim deformities. However, further research is required to ascertain the impact of the duration of wearing on the correction of congenital auricle deformities.
