Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2025
Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
Published on: July 29, 2013
Dosimetric validation of intensity-modulated bolus electron conformal therapy planning and delivery using an
Andrew S McGuffey1, Garrett M Pitcher1,2, Kevin J Erhart3
1Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Purpose:
This work investigated the dosimetric accuracy of the intensity-modulated bolus electron conformal therapy (IM-BECT) planning and delivery process using the decimal ElectronRT (eRT) treatment planning system.
Methods:
An IM-BECT treatment plan was designed using eRT for a cylindrical, anthropomorphic retromolar trigone phantom. Treatment planning involved specification of beam parameters and design of a variable thickness wax bolus and Passive Radiotherapy Intensity Modulator for Electrons (PRIME) device, which was comprised of 33 tungsten island blocks of discrete diameters from 0.158 to 0.223 cm (Intensity Reduction Factors from 0.937 to 0.875, respectively) inside a 10.1 × 6.7 cm2 copper cutout. For comparison of calculation accuracy, a BECT plan was generated by copying the IM-BECT plan and removing the intensity modulation. For both plans, a 16 MeV electron beam was used with 104.7 cm source-to-surface distance to bolus. In-phantom TLD-100 measurements (N = 47) were compared with both eRT planned dose distributions, which used the pencil beam redefinition algorithm with modifications for passive electron intensity modulation (IM-PBRA). Dose difference and distance to agreement (DTA) metrics were computed for each measurement point.
Results:
Comparison of measured dose distributions with planned dose distributions yielded dose differences (calculated minus measured) characterized by a mean and standard deviation of -0.36% ± 1.64% for the IM-BECT plan, which was similar to -0.36% ± 1.90% for the BECT plan. All dose measurements were within 5% of the planned dose distribution, with both the BECT and IM-BECT measurement sets having 46/47 (97.8%) points within 3% or within 3 mm of the respective treatment plans.
Conclusions:
It was found that the IM-BECT treatment plan generated using eRT was sufficiently accurate for clinical use when compared to TLD measurements in a cylindrical, anthropomorphic phantom, and was similarly accurate to the BECT treatment plan in the same phantom.
More Related Videos
07:57Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
Published on: March 24, 2022
08:34Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019