Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Author Spotlight: Scope of LE-ULBD as a Safe, Effective, and Minimally Invasive Approach to Treat Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Published on: February 9, 2024
Preoperative spinal education for lumbar spinal stenosis: A feasibility study
James E Eubanks1,2, Zachary A Cupler3,4, Jordan A Gliedt5
1Department of Orthopaedics and Physical Medicine, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Introduction:
Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a leading cause of chronic musculoskeletal pain among older adults. A common and costly intervention for the treatment of LSS is lumbar decompression with or without fusion (LSS surgery), which has mixed outcomes among patients. Prehabilitation is a strategy designed to optimize the consistency of positive surgical outcomes and promote patient self-efficacy, while attempting to mitigate postoperative complications. No efforts have investigated the prehabilitation strategies specifically for patients undergoing LSS surgery.
Objective:
To determine the feasibility of delivery and acceptability by participants of a novel prehabilitation intervention for patients undergoing LSS surgery.
Design:
Feasibility study.
Setting:
Outpatient orthopedic clinic at an academic medical center.
Participants:
Patients at least 50 years of age, who were scheduled for LSS surgery between October 2020 and October 2021.
Intervention:
PreOperative Spinal Education for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (POSE-LSS), is a novel multimodal, education-focused, time-efficient prehabilitation program for patients undergoing LSS surgery. Participants received the following: (1) Educational booklet and video; (2) In-person physical therapy (PT) session; and (3) Telemedicine visit with a physiatrist.
Main Outcome Measure(S):
The primary outcomes of interest were feasibility and acceptability of intervention by participants. Key potential surgical outcomes were length of stay and discharge disposition.
Results:
POSE-LSS was completed by all eligible participants enrolled (n = 15) indicating feasibility and acceptability. Potential effectiveness measures including length of stay and discharge disposition were positively associated with the POSE-LSS intervention.
Conclusions:
This study demonstrates that a novel prehabilitation intervention is feasible, acceptable, and appears positively associated with important short-term measures of postoperative recovery that may impact the trajectory of patient care following LSS surgery.

