Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Electrostatic Method to Remove Particulate Organic Matter from Soil
Published on: February 10, 2021
Impact of different sterilisation techniques on sorption and NER formation of test chemicals in soil
Rebecca Süßmuth1, Prasit Shrestha2, Cecilia Andrea Diaz Navarrete2
1Institute of Geology and Palaeontology - Applied Geology, University of Münster, Corrensstraße 24, 48149, Münster, Germany; Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME, Auf dem Aberg 1, 57392, Schmallenberg, Germany.
Abstract:
Standard OECD tests are used to generate data on biodegradation (OECD 307) and sorption (OECD 106) of test chemicals in soil. In such tests, data on abiotic degradation using sterile samples are utilised to investigate any losses due to abiotic processes. The data from sterile samples are also used to interpret results and findings of non-sterile samples, especially in the context of sorption and non-extractable residue (NER) formation. However, to ensure the comparability of the data obtained from sterile and non-sterile experiments, effects of sterilisation on the soil matrix should be minimal. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficiencies of different sterilisation techniques and the impact of the sterilisation on sorption and NER formation in soil. In this study, experiments in accordance with OECD 307 and OECD 106 guidelines were performed with two soils covering wide range of soil characteristics and treated with the three sterilisation techniques autoclaving, gamma(γ)-radiation and adding 1% (w/w) sodium azide. As a test item, 14C-labelled phenanthrene and bromoxynil was used for OECD 307 test, whereas non-labelled phenanthrene and atrazine was used for OECD 106. The sterilisation efficiencies were investigated using traditional viable plate count and molecular approaches (RNA extraction method). The results suggest that none of the tested techniques resulted in completely sterilised soil with autoclaving being the most efficient technique. Adding sodium azide led to most inefficient sterilisation and a significant increase (0.56 units) in soil pH. OECD 307 results showed differences in NER formation of the test chemicals, especially for soil poisoning and γ-radiation, which could be due to inefficient sterilisation and/or change in soil physico-chemical properties. OECD 106 results suggest that none of the sterilisation techniques considerably affected sorption behaviour of the test chemicals. Based on our results, we recommend autoclaving as most suitable sterilisation technique.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Sterilization II: Chemical Methods
Using chemical sterilization rather than heat to clean out equipment is recommended. It eradicates and removes all bacteria,...
Methods of Sterilization I: Physical Methods
Steam sterilization uses non-toxic, low-cost moist heat in the form of saturated steam under pressure, which is fast, microbicidal, and sporicidal, and quickly warms and penetrates fabrics. Autoclaves, or steam sterilizers, expose each item to direct steam contact for a predetermined time at the necessary...
Cleaning, Sterilization, and Disinfection
Cleaning
The cleaning process usually involves using water with detergents or enzymatic cleaner and removing foreign material from objects and surfaces, including organic material such as body fluids or inorganic material like soil. Cleaning is performed before high-level disinfection and sterilization because foreign materials on the cover of the devices interfere with process...

