Comparison of 4 mm-sized and 3 mm-sized Stent Retrievers in Mechanical Thrombectomy for M2 Occlusion

Han Gyul Lee1, Ho Jun Yi1,2,3, Dong-Seong Shin2

  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

PubMed
Abstract

Insights

A 4 mm stent retriever (SR) is more effective for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in M2 segment occlusions than a 3 mm SR. The larger SR requires fewer passages for reperfusion and achieves a higher first-pass reperfusion rate.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Interventional Neuroradiology
  • Medical Devices

Background:

  • Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) utilizes stent retrievers (SR) for M2 segment occlusions.
  • Optimal SR sizing for M2 occlusions remains an area of investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of 4 mm SR versus 3 mm SR in MT for M2 occlusions.
  • To evaluate procedural outcomes based on SR size.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 111 patients undergoing MT for M2 occlusion.
  • Dichotomization into 4×20 mm SR and 3×20 mm SR groups.
  • 1:1 propensity score matching and subgroup analysis for proximal and distal M2 occlusions.

Main Results:

  • The 4 mm SR group required significantly fewer stent passages for reperfusion (1.5 vs. 2.1; p=0.004).
  • First-pass reperfusion (FPR) rates were significantly higher with 4 mm SR (52.6% vs. 42.1%; p=0.007).
  • These benefits were consistent in both proximal and distal M2 occlusion subgroups.

Conclusions:

  • The 4×20 mm SR is more effective than the 3×20 mm SR for M2 occlusions.
  • Utilizing a 4 mm SR leads to a more efficient procedure with improved reperfusion outcomes.

Related Concept Videos