Related Experiment Videos
A comparison between superior and inferior border wiring techniques in sagittal split ramus osteotomy
Summary
The inferior border wiring technique for sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) results in less proximal segment rotation and gonial angle increase compared to the superior border wiring technique. This suggests better segment stability during SSRO advancement.
Area of Science:
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Orthognathic Surgery
- Surgical Anatomy
Background:
- Maintaining proper segment alignment after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) is critical for surgical success.
- Variations in fixation techniques can influence postoperative segment positioning and stability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of superior border wiring versus inferior border wiring in stabilizing segments after mandibular advancement via SSRO.
- To evaluate the impact of each wiring technique on key cephalometric parameters related to segment rotation and angulation.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study of 35 patients undergoing SSRO with advancement.
- Preoperative and postoperative lateral cephalograms were analyzed for 19 patients with inferior border wiring and 16 with superior border wiring.
- Cephalometric analysis focused on anterosuperior rotation of the proximal segment, gonial angle changes, and condylar sag.
Main Results:
- The inferior border wiring technique demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in anterosuperior rotation of the proximal segment compared to the superior border wiring technique.
- A significantly smaller increase in the gonial angle was observed with the inferior border wiring method.
- These findings indicate less displacement of the proximal segment with inferior border wiring during SSRO advancement.
Conclusions:
- Inferior border wiring is a more effective technique for minimizing undesirable proximal segment rotation and gonial angle increase following SSRO.
- The inferior border wiring technique offers superior stability and predictable outcomes in mandibular advancement surgeries.