Consistent efficacy outcomes between phase 2 and phase 3 trials in Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis in adults: a
Ziqi Wan1,2, Qingwei Jiang1, Runing Zhou1
1Department of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Introduction:
The approval of novel biologic agents and small molecules for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) is dependent on phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, these trials sometimes fail to achieve the expected efficacy outcomes observed in phase 2 trials.
Methods:
We conducted a systematic review of RCTs that evaluated biologic agents and small molecules using paired regimens in both phase 2 and phase 3. We searched Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases up until February 13, 2024. The revised Cochrane tool was utilized to assess the risk of bias. A generalized linear mixed-effects model (GLMM) was employed to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) for efficacy outcomes in phase 2 trials compared to phase 3.
Results:
We identified a total of 23 trials with 10 paired regimens for CD and 30 trials with 11 paired regimens for UC. The GLMM analysis revealed that phase 2 CD trials had higher outcomes measured by the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) by 9-13% without statistical significance: CDAI-150: OR, 1.12 (95% CI 0.83-1.51, p = 0.41); CDAI-100: OR, 1.09 (95% CI 0.88-1.35, p = 0.40); or CDAI-70: OR, 1.13 (95% CI 0.61-2.08, p = 0.66). For UC, two efficacy outcomes were estimated to be equally reported in phase 2/phase 3 pairs: clinical remission: OR, 1.00 (95% CI 0.83-1.20, p = 0.96); endoscopic improvement: OR, 0.98 (95% CI 0.83-1.15, p = 0.79). However, the rate of clinical response was underestimated in phase 2 by 19%: OR, 0.81 (95% CI 0.70-0.95, p = 0.03). The inclusion criterion for the type of Mayo score for UC had a significant interaction with the study phase to influence the difference in clinical response (p = 0.002).
Conclusions:
Our findings suggest that the main efficacy outcomes for CD and UC remain consistent between phase 2 and phase 3 trials, except for UC response rates. The efficacy data obtained from phase 2 trials can be considered reliable for the design of subsequent phase 3 trials.
Registration:
PROSPERO (CRD42023407947).
Insights
Efficacy outcomes in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) trials are generally consistent between phase 2 and phase 3. Phase 2 data for CD and UC are reliable for designing phase 3 studies, with an exception for UC response rates.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Biologic agents and small molecules for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) require phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for approval.
- Phase 3 RCTs sometimes yield different efficacy outcomes than observed in earlier phase 2 trials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and compare efficacy outcomes between phase 2 and phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for biologic agents and small molecules in CD and UC.
- To assess the reliability of phase 2 efficacy data for informing phase 3 trial design.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of RCTs evaluating paired phase 2 and phase 3 regimens for CD and UC.
- Searched Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases up to February 13, 2024.
- Utilized the revised Cochrane tool for risk of bias assessment and a generalized linear mixed-effects model (GLMM) to compare phase 2 and phase 3 efficacy outcomes.
Main Results:
- For CD, phase 2 trials showed numerically higher efficacy (9-13%) across CDAI measures but lacked statistical significance.
- For UC, clinical remission and endoscopic improvement were similar between phase 2 and 3 (ORs ~1.00).
- UC clinical response rates were underestimated in phase 2 trials (OR 0.81, p=0.03), with significant interaction noted with Mayo score inclusion criteria.
Conclusions:
- Efficacy outcomes for CD and UC are largely consistent between phase 2 and phase 3 trials.
- Phase 2 efficacy data is generally reliable for phase 3 trial design, with the exception of UC response rates.
- The findings support the continued use of phase 2 data in planning subsequent clinical trials for IBD therapeutics.
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Glucocorticoids
Drugs for Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis in IBD
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Immunomodulatory Agents
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Clinical Trials: Overview
Inflammatory Bowel Disease IV: Pharmacological Management
Pharmacologic...


