Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy01:25

Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy

90
The colon, or large intestine, is the final segment of the digestive system. Its primary functions include absorbing water and vitamins produced by gut bacteria and transforming waste from liquid to solid to form stool. In adults, the large intestine is approximately 5 feet long and consists of four main sections:
90
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy01:26

Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy

83
This lesson explores three gastrointestinal imaging techniques: radionuclide testing, colonic transit studies, and virtual colonoscopy.
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and...
83
Endoscopic Procedures III: Video Capsule Endoscopy01:28

Endoscopic Procedures III: Video Capsule Endoscopy

140
Capsule endoscopy, or wireless or video capsule endoscopy, is a diagnostic procedure for examining the entire gastrointestinal tract. Patients swallow a capsule about the size of a vitamin tablet. The capsule is equipped with a transmitter, a battery, an LED light source, and a color video camera to capture images throughout the gastrointestinal tract. This procedure is particularly useful for diagnosing conditions such as Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, tumors, polyps, ulcers,...
140
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy01:26

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

79
Sigmoidoscopy and laparoscopy are distinct medical procedures that enable physicians to internally inspect different parts of the GI tract. Although they serve different purposes, each is essential for diagnosing and, in some cases, treating various medical conditions.
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
79
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy01:29

Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

111
An Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is a diagnostic procedure in which an endoscopist uses a flexible, lighted endoscope to visualize the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The procedure includes visualizing the oropharynx, esophagus, stomach, and the first part of the small intestine, the duodenum.
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
111
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP01:26

Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP

208
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a diagnostic procedure that combines endoscopy and fluoroscopy to diagnose and treat conditions related to the bile ducts, pancreatic ducts, and gallbladder. This procedure is beneficial for identifying and addressing blockages, gallstones, strictures, and tumors within the biliary or pancreatic systems. ERCP is both diagnostic and therapeutic, offering the ability to visualize and treat identified problems in one session.
Patient...
208

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Combined Association of Time to Treatment, Guideline Concordance, and Neighborhood Vulnerability with Localized Colon Cancer, Non-small-cell Lung Cancer, and Pancreatic Cancer Survival.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

Right-Sizing QI Collaboratives for Real-World, Resource-Lean Residency Settings.

PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)·2026
Same author

Provider- and System-Level Barriers and Facilitators to Colonoscopy and Multi-Target Stool DNA for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural/Remote Alaska Native Communities.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2023
Same author

Implementation and Uptake of Rural Lung Cancer Screening.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2022
Same author

Help Desk Answers: Do novel oral anticoagulants safely prevent stroke in patients with nonvalvular A-fib?

The Journal of family practice·2016
Same author

Animal-related motorcycle collisions in North Dakota.

Wilderness & environmental medicine·2012
Same journal

Response to Yu, Wang and Ge.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2026
Same journal

Re: Cardiovascular disease risk after radiotherapy and anthracycline-based chemotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2026
Same journal

Welcome reduction of US cervical cancer rates despite state differences.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2026
Same journal

Adjuvant dual HER2 blockade along the HER2-ER axis in APHINITY.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2026
Same journal

Re: Health-related quality of life in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer receiving maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab (PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25).

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2026
Same journal

Outcome of metastatic non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma in children and young adults treated on children's oncology group ARST0332 trial.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 29, 2025

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

8.3K

Evaluating colonoscopy quality by performing provider type.

Emily Berry1, Jeff Hostetter2, Joseph Bachtold3

  • 1University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Moncrief Cancer Institute, Fort Worth, TX, USA.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute
|April 8, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Non-gastroenterologist providers perform colonoscopies with quality comparable to gastroenterologists. Key quality indicators for colorectal cancer screening were met or exceeded by all provider types.

More Related Videos

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System
15:49

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System

Published on: October 16, 2013

31.8K
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

261

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 29, 2025

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

8.3K
Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System
15:49

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System

Published on: October 16, 2013

31.8K
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

261

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Public Health
  • Surgical Procedures

Background:

  • Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer death in the US.
  • Colonoscopy is crucial for colorectal cancer screening and follow-up.
  • Quality of colonoscopy is assessed by bowel preparation, cecal intubation, withdrawal time, and adenoma detection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and compare the quality and safety of screening colonoscopies performed by non-gastroenterologist (non-GI) practitioners versus gastroenterologists (GI).
  • To assess if non-GI providers meet established quality metrics for colonoscopy.

Main Methods:

  • Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the study population.
  • Colonoscopy quality indicators were stratified and compared between provider types (GI, general surgeons, family medicine).
  • Statistical significance was set at P < .05, with all P values being 2-sided.

Main Results:

  • No statistically significant differences were observed in colonoscopy quality between non-GI and GI providers.
  • All provider types achieved or surpassed benchmarks for cecal intubation (98-100%), bowel preparation (97.4-100%), adenoma detection rates (male: 57.4-88.9%; female: 47.7-62.13%), and mean withdrawal time (0:12:10 to 0:20:16).
  • All quality indicators met or exceeded goal metrics across all provider groups (P < .001).

Conclusions:

  • Non-GI practitioners perform screening colonoscopies with quality comparable to GI practitioners.
  • The study supports the use of non-GI providers for colonoscopies, particularly in underserved areas.
  • Performance outcomes indicate that non-GI providers meet key quality metrics for colonoscopy.