The PARTNER trial of neoadjuvant olaparib with chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer

Jean E Abraham1,2, Karen Pinilla3,4, Alimu Dayimu5

  • 1Precision Breast Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. ja344@cam.ac.uk.

Nature
|April 8, 2024
PubMed

Insights

Neoadjuvant olaparib did not improve outcomes for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who were germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 wild type. The PARTNER trial found no significant differences in pathologic complete response, event-free survival, or overall survival between treatment arms.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Clinical Trials
  • Breast Cancer Research

Background:

  • Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) lacks targeted therapies, necessitating novel treatment strategies.
  • Germline BRCA1/2 mutations are associated with specific breast cancer subtypes, but their role in wild-type TNBC treatment response is under investigation.
  • The PARTNER trial evaluated the efficacy of adding olaparib to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy for TNBC patients with wild-type germline BRCA1/2.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if neoadjuvant olaparib improves pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients with germline BRCA1/2 wild-type TNBC.
  • To assess the impact of neoadjuvant olaparib on event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in this patient population.
  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining olaparib with carboplatin-paclitaxel and anthracycline-based chemotherapy.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective, phase II-III, randomized controlled trial (PARTNER) involving 559 patients with TNBC and wild-type germline BRCA1/2.
  • Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive neoadjuvant carboplatin-paclitaxel with or without olaparib, followed by anthracycline-based chemotherapy.
  • Primary endpoint was pCR; secondary endpoints included EFS and OS. Olaparib was administered on a gap schedule for four cycles.

Main Results:

  • No significant difference in pCR rates between the olaparib arm (51%) and the control arm (52%) (P=0.753).
  • Event-free survival at 36 months was 80% in the olaparib arm and 79% in the control arm (P>0.9).
  • Overall survival at 36 months was 90% in the olaparib arm and 87.2% in the control arm (P=0.8).

Conclusions:

  • Neoadjuvant olaparib, when added to standard chemotherapy, did not improve pCR, EFS, or OS in patients with germline BRCA1/2 wild-type TNBC.
  • The addition of olaparib to neoadjuvant carboplatin-paclitaxel and anthracycline-based chemotherapy is not beneficial for this specific TNBC subgroup.
  • Further research may be needed to identify predictive biomarkers for PARP inhibitor efficacy in TNBC patients without germline BRCA mutations.