Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2025

10:24
Applicability Analysis of Assessment Methods for Morphological Parameters of Corroded Steel Bars
Published on: November 1, 2018
6.7K
Assessment of Performance-Based Seismic Design Methods in ASCE 41 for New Steel Buildings: Special Moment Frames
John Harris1, Matthew Speichera1
1National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Dr., Gaithersburg, MD 20899.
Summary
Buildings designed to current seismic standards (ASCE 7) may not meet older building performance criteria (ASCE 41). Special moment frames struggle to satisfy acceptance criteria for equivalent new building performance.
Area of Science:
- Structural Engineering
- Earthquake Engineering
- Seismic Design
Background:
- Current seismic design codes (ASCE 7) aim to ensure building safety.
- ASCE 41 provides analysis procedures and performance metrics for existing buildings.
- Discrepancies may exist between new design standards and existing building evaluation criteria.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the correlation between anticipated seismic performance under ASCE 7 and predicted performance using ASCE 41.
- To evaluate if steel buildings with special moment frames designed to ASCE 7 meet ASCE 41 acceptance criteria for existing buildings.
- To identify potential challenges in seismic retrofitting and performance assessment.
Main Methods:
- Utilized analytical procedures based on component-level performance.
- Focused on the collapse prevention structural performance level.
- Compared design outcomes of ASCE 7-compliant special moment frames with ASCE 41 acceptance criteria.
Main Results:
- Analytical results indicate challenges in meeting ASCE 41 acceptance criteria.
- Special moment frames designed per ASCE 7 show difficulty in achieving the target performance level defined by ASCE 41.
- The study highlights a potential gap between new construction seismic standards and existing building evaluation.
Conclusions:
- Steel buildings with special moment frames designed to ASCE 7 may not satisfy ASCE 41 performance requirements for existing structures.
- There is a need to reconcile differences between seismic design codes for new buildings and evaluation standards for existing ones.
- Further research may be needed to bridge the performance gap and ensure consistent seismic safety.
Related Concept Videos
Design of Prismatic Beams for Bending
228
The design of prismatic beams, structural elements with a uniform cross-section, focuses on ensuring safety and structural integrity under load. The design process begins by determining the allowable stress, either from material properties tables, or by dividing the material's ultimate strength by a safety factor. This safety factor is essential for accommodating uncertainties, and varies depending on the material—timber, steel, or concrete—with each having unique strength and...
228
Design Consideration
186
Designing a structure involves a series of considerations, primarily the material's ultimate strength, calculated through tests that measure changes under increased force until the material reaches its breaking point or limit. The ultimate load, where the material breaks, is divided by its original cross-sectional area, resulting in the ultimate normal stress or strength. The ultimate shearing stress is another significant factor taken into account.
The factor of safety is another key...
The factor of safety is another key...
186
Prismatic Beams: Problem Solving
110
In the design of a supported timber beam subjected to a distributed load, both the beam's physical dimensions and the timber's characteristics, such as its grade and species, are critical. These factors determine the allowable stress values, which are crucial for calculating the necessary beam depth to ensure structural integrity and safety.
The design begins with analyzing the beam as a free body to identify moments and force balances, thereby determining support reactions. Next, the...
The design begins with analyzing the beam as a free body to identify moments and force balances, thereby determining support reactions. Next, the...
110
Beams with Unsymmetric Loadings
119
Analyzing a supported beam under unsymmetrical loadings is essential in structural engineering to understand how beams respond to varied force distributions. This analysis involves calculating the deflection and identifying points where the slope of the beam is zero, which are crucial for ensuring structural stability and functionality.
The first moment-area theorem determines the slope at any point on the beam. This theorem indicates that the change in slope between two points on a beam...
The first moment-area theorem determines the slope at any point on the beam. This theorem indicates that the change in slope between two points on a beam...
119
Method of Superposition
833
The method of superposition is a crucial technique in structural engineering, used to analyze the effect of multiple loads on beams. This approach involves calculating the deflection and slope for each load on a beam separately, and then summing these effects to determine the overall impact. It is applicable only when the beam material remains within its elastic limit, ensuring that deformations are linearly elastic.
When applying the method of superposition, each type of load—whether...
When applying the method of superposition, each type of load—whether...
833
Frames: Problem Solving II
228
Consider a hydraulic hoist supporting a load of 1 kN. Assuming a simplified schematic representation of this frame structure, the force acting on BD and BF members can be determined.
228

