Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2025

04:09
Prospective, Randomized, and Controlled Study of a Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell Injection for Treating Diabetic Foot Ulcers
Published on: March 3, 2023
2.9K
Bioengineered Skin for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Scoping Review
Nathaniel R Primous1, Peter T Elvin1,2, Kathleen V Carter3
1Department of Podiatric Medicine, Surgery and Biomechanics, School of Podiatric Medicine, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Harlingen, TX 78550, USA.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
|April 9, 2024
Summary
Bioengineered skin substitutes (BSS) show promise for treating diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), outperforming standard wound care (SWC). However, their effectiveness compared to human amniotic membrane allografts (hAMA) requires further investigation.
Area of Science:
- Regenerative Medicine
- Wound Healing
- Diabetes Mellitus Research
Background:
- Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a serious complication of diabetes mellitus (DM), leading to significant morbidity and potential lower limb amputation.
- Bioengineered skin substitutes (BSS) offer a potential alternative to traditional treatments for DFUs.
- The comparative efficacy of BSS against standard wound care (SWC) and other regenerative options like allografts is not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a scoping review of human studies evaluating the efficacy of BSS in DFU treatment.
- To compare BSS with SWC and other treatment modalities, including allografts.
- To identify current approaches and knowledge gaps in BSS application for DFUs.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature searches were performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for comparative studies.
- Studies published between December 1, 2012, and December 1, 2022, with at least 10 patients were included.
- PRISMA-ScR guidelines were followed, focusing on wound healing outcomes (closure, time-to-healing, area reduction).
Main Results:
- Out of 1312 initially identified articles, 24 were included in the qualitative analysis.
- Bioengineered skin substitutes (BSS) demonstrated superior performance compared to standard wound care (SWC) across all evaluated wound healing metrics.
- Eight studies compared BSS with human amniotic membrane allografts (hAMA), yielding conflicting results.
Conclusions:
- Bioengineered skin substitutes (BSS) appear to be a more effective treatment for diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) than standard wound care (SWC).
- The comparative effectiveness of BSS versus human amniotic membrane allografts (hAMA) for DFU treatment remains inconclusive.
- Further research is warranted to clarify the role of BSS and hAMA in the management of diabetic foot ulcers.

