The Added Value of MRI-Based Targeted Biopsy in Biopsy-Naïve Patients: A Propensity-Score Matched Comparison
- Gernot Ortner 1,2, Charalampos Mavridis 3,4, Veronika Fritz 1,2, Jörg Schachtner 1,2, Charalampos Mamoulakis 3,4, Udo Nagele 1,2, Theodoros Tokas 2,3,4
- Gernot Ortner 1,2, Charalampos Mavridis 3,4, Veronika Fritz 1,2
- 1Department of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall i.T., 6060 Hall in Tirol, Austria.
- 2Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group, 6060 Hall in Tirol, Austria.
- 3Department of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, 71110 Heraklion, Greece.
- 4School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece.
- 0Department of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall i.T., 6060 Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI)-based combined biopsy (CB) significantly improves detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in biopsy-naïve patients compared to systematic-only biopsy (SOB). This approach avoids overdiagnosis of non-clinically significant prostate cancer.
Area Of Science
- Urology
- Oncology
- Radiology
Background
- Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI)-guided targeted biopsy aids in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) and avoiding non-clinically significant prostate cancer (ncsPCa) diagnosis.
- The utility of mpMRI-based targeted biopsy in biopsy-naïve patients remains under investigation.
Purpose Of The Study
- To compare the efficacy of mpMRI-based combined biopsy (CB) versus systematic-only biopsy (SOB) in diagnosing csPCa in biopsy-naïve patients.
- To evaluate the impact of CB on the detection of ncsPCa and overall cancer diagnosis.
Main Methods
- A propensity-score matched comparison between a systematic-only biopsy (SOB) cohort and a mpMRI-based combined (systematic + targeted) biopsy (CB) cohort.
- Inclusion of only biopsy-naïve patients from two tertiary urologic centers.
- Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis (MLRA) to identify csPCa predictors, with g-computation used to estimate Average Treatment effect of the Treated (ATT).
Main Results
- The CB group showed a significantly higher csPCa detection rate (46.4%) compared to the SOB group (31.4%) (RR 1.48, p=0.01).
- CB demonstrated a trend towards reduced ncsPCa diagnosis (15.7% vs 23.6%, p=0.1) and a significant reduction in the odds of csPCa diagnosis when comparing SOB to CB (OR 0.56, p=0.003).
- Targeted-only cores added 4.3% to csPCa detection, while systematic-only cores added 1.4%.
Conclusions
- The combined biopsy approach (CB) is superior to systematic-only biopsy (SOB) for detecting csPCa in biopsy-naïve patients.
- The CB approach does not lead to additional detection of ncsPCa.
- mpMRI-guided biopsy is recommended for biopsy-naïve patients with suspected prostate cancer.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

