Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Fractures: Bone Repair01:27

Fractures: Bone Repair

3.2K
Treatment for a fracture is based on the type of break, the bone affected, and the patient's age.
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the...
3.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Systematic reviews in PRP-augmented meniscal repair have limited methodological quality: A systematic overview.

Journal of experimental orthopaedics·2026
Same author

How Common is Dysphagia After Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery, What Drives it, and Can it be Prevented? An Umbrella Review of Systematic Evidence.

Global spine journal·2026
Same author

The enigma of culture-negative spondylodiscitis: comparable outcomes despite diagnostic uncertainty - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society·2026
Same author

Feasibility and Safety of 2 C1 Pedicle Screw Trajectories: A Morphometric CT Analysis in an Adult Indian Population.

Clinical spine surgery·2026
Same author

Exosomal Biomarkers: Paving the Way for Precision Diagnosis in Orthopedics.

Stem cell reviews and reports·2026
Same author

Management of Atypical Hangman's Fracture (C2 Axis): Systematic Review of Classification, Treatment Strategies, and Clinical Outcomes.

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2025

Autologous Microfractured and Purified Adipose Tissue for Arthroscopic Management of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus
07:24

Autologous Microfractured and Purified Adipose Tissue for Arthroscopic Management of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus

Published on: January 23, 2018

10.3K

Does progress in microfracture techniques necessarily translate into clinical effectiveness?

Sathish Muthu1,2,3, Vibhu Krishnan Viswanathan4, Manoharan Sakthivel5

  • 1Department of Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic Research Group, Coimbatore 641045, Tamil Nadu, India.

World Journal of Orthopedics
|April 10, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Advancements in microfracture (MFx) techniques, including MFx-III, show trends toward improved pain control and functional outcomes for cartilage defects, though not statistically significant. Higher generations demonstrated better MRI cartilage repair scores at one year.

Keywords:
Bone marrow aspiration concentratesCartilage injuryClinical outcomeMesenchymal stem cellsMeta-analysisMicrofractureNetwork meta-analysisPlatelet-rich plasmaRadiological outcome

More Related Videos

Fracture Apparatus Design and Protocol Optimization for Closed-stabilized Fractures in Rodents
06:59

Fracture Apparatus Design and Protocol Optimization for Closed-stabilized Fractures in Rodents

Published on: August 14, 2018

13.4K
Less-Invasive Technique for Non-stabilized Mandibular Fracture in Mouse Models
04:13

Less-Invasive Technique for Non-stabilized Mandibular Fracture in Mouse Models

Published on: September 27, 2024

339

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2025

Autologous Microfractured and Purified Adipose Tissue for Arthroscopic Management of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus
07:24

Autologous Microfractured and Purified Adipose Tissue for Arthroscopic Management of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus

Published on: January 23, 2018

10.3K
Fracture Apparatus Design and Protocol Optimization for Closed-stabilized Fractures in Rodents
06:59

Fracture Apparatus Design and Protocol Optimization for Closed-stabilized Fractures in Rodents

Published on: August 14, 2018

13.4K
Less-Invasive Technique for Non-stabilized Mandibular Fracture in Mouse Models
04:13

Less-Invasive Technique for Non-stabilized Mandibular Fracture in Mouse Models

Published on: September 27, 2024

339

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedics
  • Regenerative Medicine
  • Biomaterials

Background:

  • The traditional microfracture (MFx) technique for cartilage defects has seen numerous advancements.
  • These include the use of acellular second-generation MFx and cellular MFx-III components.
  • The comparative benefits and drawbacks of these MFx modifications remain unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comparatively analyze functional, radiological, and histological outcomes.
  • To assess complications associated with various generations of MFx for cartilage defect treatment.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted.
  • Databases searched included PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus.
  • Network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed using Stata with Cochrane's Confidence in NMA approach.

Main Results:

  • Forty-four RCTs involving patients with a mean age of 39.40 years were analyzed.
  • MFx-III showed a trend towards better pain control and functional outcomes (KOOS, IKDC, Cincinnati scores) compared to MFx-I, but without statistical significance.
  • Higher MFx generations demonstrated statistically significant improvements in MRI cartilage repair scores at 1 year, which were not sustained at 2 years. Trends towards better defect filling on MRI were observed but were not statistically significant.

Conclusions:

  • Advanced MFx techniques, incorporating acellular and cellular components, offer only marginal improvements in clinical and radiological outcomes for cartilage defects.
  • Further research may be needed to fully elucidate the benefits of newer MFx generations.