Related Experiment Videos
Accuracy of an earpiece face-bow
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
|June 1, 1985
Summary
The Hanau ear-bow’s arbitrary hinge axis transfer is less accurate than the kinematic face-bow, with significant anteroposterior discrepancies and poor repeatability. Further research is needed to improve its clinical utility.
Area of Science:
- Dental Articulation and Biomechanics
- Maxillofacial Prosthetics
Background:
- Accurate transfer of the patient's true hinge axis to an articulator is crucial for prosthetic restorations.
- Arbitrary face-bows are commonly used for hinge axis transfer, but their accuracy is debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To clinically compare the validity of the Hanau ear-bow for arbitrary hinge axis transfer against the Hanau kinematic face-bow.
- To assess the accuracy and repeatability of the arbitrary hinge axis determined by the ear-bow.
Main Methods:
- A clinical study involving 18 randomly selected patients.
- Comparison of hinge axis locations determined by the Hanau ear-bow and the Hanau kinematic face-bow.
- Statistical analysis of discrepancies in anteroposterior and superior-inferior directions.
Main Results:
- A statistically significant difference was found between the arbitrary hinge axis (ear-bow) and the terminal hinge axis (kinematic face-bow).
- Discrepancies were significant in the anteroposterior direction.
- Only 50% of arbitrary hinge axes were within a 5 mm radius of the terminal hinge axis; 89% were within 6 mm.
- The ear-bow method demonstrated poor statistical repeatability.
Conclusions:
- The Hanau ear-bow is not a statistically valid method for accurately transferring the arbitrary hinge axis compared to the kinematic face-bow.
- Significant anteroposterior inaccuracies and poor repeatability limit the clinical reliability of the ear-bow.
- Further investigation and modifications are required to enhance the accuracy and practical value of arbitrary face-bows.