A Modified Subbrow Blepharoplasty for Correction of Severe Upper Eyelid Skin Laxity

Periorbital aging is characterized by dermatochalasis, lateral hooding and malformation of multiple eyelid creases. Rejuvenation of periorbital region is of great concern in aging Asians, especially for the females. However, the conventional subbrow blepharoplasty was indicated for mild or moderate skin laxity. For severe laxity, double-eyelid incision is necessarily to be involved. This study aims to improve the severe upper eyelid dermatochalasis through an extended subbrow single-incision approach with desirable outcomes.

Patients underwent this surgical method from October 2020 to April 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The redundant skin and orbicularis oculi muscle were excised through a spindle-like subbrow incision delicately designed in the sitting position. Surgical outcomes were evaluated by heights of designed line from the palpebral margin to the pupil center (HPPC), medial cornea (HPMC), and lateral canthus (HPLC) at different follow-ups. The overall satisfaction score of cosmetic outcomes was assessed by an independent surgeon and patients themselves based on the evaluation of: subbrow scar, eyelid symmetry, lateral hooding lifting, visual block improvement and brow shape.

A total of 75 cases were reviewed, including 3 men and 72 women. The preoperative HPPC, HPMC, and HPLC were 4.27 ± 0.40, 4.72 ± 0.45 and 3.41 ± 0.35 mm. The values were postoperatively improved to 7.01 ± 0.46, 6.57 ± 0.34 and 5.69 ± 0.26 mm, respectively, presenting significantly different (p < 0.05). The mean surgeon satisfaction scores were 3.6 ± 0.6 (range, 2.0-4.0), and patient satisfaction scores were 3.5 ± 0.6 (range, 2.0-4.0). No hypertrophic scar, sunken upper eyelids or other complications was found.

The modified subbrow blepharoplasty method is an effective and safe alternative for correcting severe upper eyelid skin laxity, which can achieve both good cosmetic outcomes and functional improvement.

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .