Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026
A Modified Vessel-Sparing Microsurgical Vasoepididymostomy
Published on: June 8, 2022
[Efficiency and safety of microsurgical cluster ligation of the spermatic vein]
Jing-Kai Wang1, Kun Pang2,3, Peng Xu1
1School of Medicine, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212001, China.
Objective:
To study the effect and safety of microscopic varicocele cluster ligation (MVCL).
Methods:
We selected 28 patients undergoing bilateral microscopic spermatic vein ligation in Xuzhou Central Hospital from July 2021 to June 2022. Using the computerized randomization method, we performed MVCL or microscopic varicocele ligation (MVL) for the right or the left spermatic cord, respectively. We recorded the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, the numbers of the spermatic veins ligated and the arteries and lymphatic vessels preserved in each surgical side. A surgeon unaware of the surgical approach on the operative side collected the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores, nodular foreign body sensation, relief of scrotal cramps, complications, and long-term recurrence from the patients.
Results:
Compared with the MVL group, the MVCL group showed significantly shorter time for spermatic vein ligation (［56.21±13.96］ vs ［31.43±10.13］ min, P<0.01), lower VAS scores on the 1st postoperative day (P <0.05) and a lower incidence of intra-scrotal nodular foreign body sensation in the 1st postoperative month (P <0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the intraoperative blood loss, numbers of spermatic veins ligated and arteries and lymphatic vessels preserved, VAS scores at 3 and 7 postoperative days, incidence of complications and long-term recurrence between the two groups (P >0.05).
Conclusion:
MVCL is superior to MVL in reducing the time of spermatic vein ligation and improving the efficiency, efficacy and safety of the procedure, and therefore worthy of clinical promotion.
