Angiographic Coronary Slow Flow Is Not a Valid Surrogate for Invasively Diagnosed Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction

Michael Mayer1, Tess Allan1, Kenneth L Harkin2

  • 1Department of Cardiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Insights

Coronary slow flow on angiography is weakly linked to invasive measures of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). Angiographic slow flow should not replace invasive testing for diagnosing CMD.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Vascular Biology
  • Diagnostic Imaging

Background:

  • Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a common cause of ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries.
  • Current diagnostic criteria for CMD include assessing slow coronary flow using corrected TIMI frame count (cTFC).
  • The relationship between angiographic slow flow (cTFC) and invasive coronary function testing (CFT) for CMD diagnosis remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the correlation between cTFC and invasive CFT parameters in diagnosing CMD.
  • To determine if angiographic slow flow is a reliable indicator of microvascular dysfunction.

Main Methods:

  • Adult patients with ischemia and no obstructive coronary arteries underwent invasive CFT.
  • Measurements included baseline coronary blood flow, coronary flow reserve (CFR), and index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR).
  • Coronary slow flow was defined as cTFC >25 and CMD was defined by abnormal CFR and/or IMR.

Main Results:

  • Of 508 adults, 49% had coronary slow flow.
  • Slow flow was associated with higher odds of abnormal IMR but lower odds of abnormal CFR.
  • cTFC showed weak correlations with baseline coronary blood flow, CFR, and IMR.

Conclusions:

  • Coronary slow flow demonstrates a weak association with invasive CFT results.
  • Angiographic slow flow should not be utilized as a substitute for invasive diagnostic methods for CMD.
Abstract