Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Potentiometry: Types of Electrodes01:19

Potentiometry: Types of Electrodes

639
Reference electrodes serve as a stable reference point for potentiometric measurements, while indicator and working electrodes react to variations in the composition of a solution.
The Standard Hydrogen Electrode (SHE) is a widely used reference electrode that maintains zero potential across all temperatures. However, its need for a continuous hydrogen gas supply renders it impractical for everyday use.
An alternative to SHE is the Saturated Calomel Electrode (SCE). This electrode features an...
639
Potentiometry: Membrane Electrodes01:15

Potentiometry: Membrane Electrodes

568
Membrane electrodes, also known as p-ion electrodes, use membranes that selectively interact with free analyte ions, generating a potential difference across the membrane. The resulting membrane potential, known as the asymmetry potential, is not zero even when analyte concentrations on both sides of the membrane are equal. The membrane's response is typically not selective to a single analyte but proportional to the concentration of all ions in the sample solution capable of interacting at...
568
Electrodes: Overview01:17

Electrodes: Overview

1.7K
 Electrochemical measurements are conducted in an electrochemical cell composed of various components that control and measure the current and potential. One fundamental component is electrodes, conductive materials that enable electron transfer reactions at their surfaces.
There are two main types of electrodes in electrochemical cells. The first type, known as the working or indicator electrode, has a potential that is sensitive to the analyte's concentration and reacts to changes in...
1.7K
Controlled-Potential Coulometry: Electrolytic Methods01:17

Controlled-Potential Coulometry: Electrolytic Methods

161
Controlled-potential coulometry, also known as potentiostatic coulometry, employs a three-electrode system in which the working electrode's potential is precisely regulated using a potentiostat. Platinum working electrodes are utilized for positive potentials, while mercury pool electrodes are favored for extremely negative potentials. The platinum counter electrode is separated from the analyte using a membrane or salt bridge to avoid interference in the analysis.
The chosen potential...
161
Standard Electrode Potentials03:02

Standard Electrode Potentials

43.8K
On comparing the reactivity of silver and lead, it is observed that the two ionic species, Ag+ (aq) and Pb2+ (aq), show a difference in their redox reactivity towards copper: the silver ion undergoes spontaneous reduction, while the lead ion does not. This relative redox activity can be easily quantified in electrochemical cells by a property called cell potential. This property is commonly known as cell voltage in electrochemistry, and it is a measure of the energy which accompanies the charge...
43.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Tunable Core-Shell Metal Alloy Pillar Design in Vertically Aligned Nanostructures Toward Multifunctionality.

Small science·2026
Same author

Lithium-ion intercalation by coupled ion-electron transfer.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Dislocation-enabled plasticity in rutile TiO<sub>2-<i>x</i></sub> at room temperature.

Nanoscale·2025
Same author

Scaling analysis of mosaic phase separation in Li-ion batteries.

Physical review. E·2025
Same author

Survey of Microstructures and Dimensional Accuracy of Various Microlattice Designs Using Additively Manufactured 718 Superalloy.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Achieving room temperature plasticity in brittle ceramics through elevated temperature preloading.

Science advances·2024
Same journal

Novel Parent Survey Measures Sensory Behaviors Incorporating Sensory Modality and Stimulus Intensity.

Heliyon·2026
Same journal

Expression of concern: "SQSTM1/p62 promotes the progression of gastric cancer through epithelial-mesenchymal transition" [Heliyon 10 (2024) e24409].

Heliyon·2026
Same journal

Expression of concern: "TL1A promotes metastasis and EMT process of colorectal cancer" [Heliyon 10 (2024) e24392].

Heliyon·2026
Same journal

Expression of concern: "Factors affecting timing of surgery following neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer" [Heliyon 9 (2023) e23212].

Heliyon·2026
Same journal

Expression of concern: "On stratified single-valued soft topogenous structures" [Heliyon 10 (2024) e27926].

Heliyon·2026
Same journal

Expression of concern: "Artifact removal and motor imagery classification in EEG using advanced algorithms and modified DNN" [Heliyon 10 (2024) e27198].

Heliyon·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2025

Precise Electrochemical Sizing of Individual Electro-Inactive Particles
05:03

Precise Electrochemical Sizing of Individual Electro-Inactive Particles

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.2K

Performance benchmarks for open source porous electrode theory models.

Surya Mitra Ayalasomayajula1, Daniel Cogswell2, Debbie Zhuang2

  • 1School of Material Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47906, United States of America.

Heliyon
|April 11, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study benchmarks porous electrode theory (PET) models for battery simulations. While models show similar voltage responses, their internal electrochemical profiles differ, potentially leading to varied conclusions on battery performance.

More Related Videos

A Method for Systematic Electrochemical and Electrophysiological Evaluation of Neural Recording Electrodes
09:27

A Method for Systematic Electrochemical and Electrophysiological Evaluation of Neural Recording Electrodes

Published on: March 3, 2014

13.5K
Synthesis of Platinum-nickel Nanowires and Optimization for Oxygen Reduction Performance
09:02

Synthesis of Platinum-nickel Nanowires and Optimization for Oxygen Reduction Performance

Published on: April 27, 2018

7.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2025

Precise Electrochemical Sizing of Individual Electro-Inactive Particles
05:03

Precise Electrochemical Sizing of Individual Electro-Inactive Particles

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.2K
A Method for Systematic Electrochemical and Electrophysiological Evaluation of Neural Recording Electrodes
09:27

A Method for Systematic Electrochemical and Electrophysiological Evaluation of Neural Recording Electrodes

Published on: March 3, 2014

13.5K
Synthesis of Platinum-nickel Nanowires and Optimization for Oxygen Reduction Performance
09:02

Synthesis of Platinum-nickel Nanowires and Optimization for Oxygen Reduction Performance

Published on: April 27, 2018

7.8K

Area of Science:

  • Electrochemistry
  • Materials Science
  • Computational Modeling

Background:

  • Porous Electrode Theory (PET) models are crucial for simulating battery electrochemical behavior.
  • Existing and emerging PET models require benchmarking to understand their accuracy and limitations.
  • LiMn2O4-graphite cells are widely used in battery research and applications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To benchmark the electrochemical response characteristics of various Porous Electrode Theory (PET) models.
  • To establish a common basis for assessing the physical reaches, limitations, and accuracy of PET models.
  • To compare the simulation accuracy of dualfoil, MPET, and LIONSIMBA models against experimental data.

Main Methods:

  • Benchmarking of three open-source PET models: dualfoil, MPET, and LIONSIMBA.
  • Simulation of LiMn2O4-graphite cell discharge using the selected PET models.
  • Comparison of simulated discharge voltage curves against experimental data across various C-rates.

Main Results:

  • All three models (dualfoil, MPET, LIONSIMBA) showed good agreement (<4% deviation) with experimental data below 2C.
  • At higher C-rates (>3C), dualfoil and MPET exhibited smaller deviations (<5%) compared to experiments.
  • Significant qualitative differences in electrochemical profiles were observed among the models, despite similar macroscopic voltage responses.

Conclusions:

  • PET models can accurately predict macroscopic battery voltage responses, especially at lower charge/discharge rates.
  • Qualitative differences in simulated electrochemical profiles can lead to divergent interpretations of battery performance and degradation.
  • Careful selection and validation of PET models are essential for accurate battery system analysis.