Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Test for Homogeneity01:23

Test for Homogeneity

2.0K
The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can...
2.0K
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

1.6K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
1.6K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

3.3K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
3.3K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

179
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
179
Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test01:09

Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test

1.6K
In parametric statistics, two fundamental tests stand out for their utility and wide application: the Student's t-test and goodness-of-fit tests. These tests provide researchers with a robust method for drawing insights from data, testing hypotheses, and making informed decisions based on their findings.
The Student's t-test is a statistical test that examines if there is a statistically significant difference between the means of two groups. This test is instrumental when dealing with...
1.6K
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

3.4K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
3.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How do network structures of depressive symptoms differ between asian patients with bipolar depression and those with unipolar depression?

Asian journal of psychiatry·2026
Same author

Prevalence of GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Use Among Privately Insured Individuals With Mood Disorders.

The Journal of clinical psychiatry·2026
Same author

The American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology task force consensus statement on the deprescribing of stimulant medications in adults with ADHD<sup>✰</sup>.

European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology·2026
Same author

Ketamine Infusions and Rapid Reduction of Suicidal and Depressive Symptoms in Major Depressive Episode: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

JAMA psychiatry·2026
Same author

Lithium effects on renal functioning: an expert opinion and management algorithm.

International journal of bipolar disorders·2026
Same author

All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality in Patients With Bipolar II Disorder.

JAMA network open·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K

Testing similarity in longitudinal networks: The Individual Network Invariance Test.

Ria H A Hoekstra1, Sacha Epskamp2, Andrew A Nierenberg3

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam.

Psychological Methods
|April 11, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Researchers can now directly test for differences between individual network structures using the new Individual Network Invariance Test (INIT). This method offers a statistically sound approach to analyzing heterogeneity in idiographic networks.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

758
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

758
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.9K

Area of Science:

  • Psychological network analysis
  • Structural equation modeling
  • Individual differences research

Background:

  • Comparing idiographic network structures to assess heterogeneity is difficult.
  • Previous methods like visual inspection or multilevel modeling do not directly test network equality.
  • Existing techniques lack the ability to directly compare individual network structures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Introduce the Individual Network Invariance Test (INIT) for comparing idiographic networks.
  • Implement INIT within an R package for practical application.
  • Provide a direct method for testing the equality of idiographic network structures.

Main Methods:

  • Developed the Individual Network Invariance Test (INIT).
  • Implemented INIT in an R package.
  • Evaluated INIT using a simulation study with varying network structures (saturated and pruned) and sample sizes.
  • Utilized chi-squared difference tests and model selection criteria (AIC, BIC).

Main Results:

  • INIT demonstrates adequate performance with 100 time points per individual.
  • For saturated networks, the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) was the best model selection criterion.
  • For pruned networks, the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) showed superior performance.
  • An empirical example demonstrated INIT's utility for testing network equality within and across time.

Conclusions:

  • INIT provides a statistically valid method for testing the equality of idiographic network structures.
  • The choice of model selection criterion (AIC vs. BIC) depends on whether networks are saturated or pruned.
  • INIT enables direct comparison of individual networks, advancing the study of individual differences.