Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Visual System

Visual System

Light enters the eye through the cornea, a transparent, dome-shaped surface covering the surface of the eyeball that helps to direct and focus incoming light. This light is then channeled toward the pupil, an adjustable opening whose size is controlled by the iris. The iris, a pigmented muscle, regulates the amount of light entering the eye by contracting or dilating the pupil, thereby ensuring optimal light levels for clear vision.
Once through the pupil, the light passes through the lens, a...

Visual Agnosia

Visual Agnosia

Visual agnosia is a condition characterized by the inability to recognize visually presented objects despite having normal vision. For instance, a person with visual agnosia can describe the shape and color of an object but cannot identify or name it. This impairment does not affect their visual field, acuity, color vision, brightness discrimination, language, or memory. An example of this condition in a social setting is someone at a dinner party asking for "that silver thing with a round...

Vision

Vision

Vision is the result of light being detected and transduced into neural signals by the retina of the eye. This information is then further analyzed and interpreted by the brain. First, light enters the front of the eye and is focused by the cornea and lens onto the retina—a thin sheet of neural tissue lining the back of the eye. Because of refraction through the convex lens of the eye, images are projected onto the retina upside-down and reversed.

Association Areas of the Cortex

Association Areas of the Cortex

Association areas are regions of the cerebral cortex that do not have a specific sensory or motor function. Instead, they integrate and interpret information from various sources to enable higher cognitive processes such as memory, learning, and decision-making. Some key association areas include the following:
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Preparing to produce (without production) is sufficient to elicit a behavioral and pupillometric production effect.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026

Same author

How varying cue duration influences item-method directed forgetting: A novel selective retrieval interpretation.

Memory & cognition·2024

Same author

Productions Need Not Match Study Items to Confer a Production Advantage, But It Helps.

Experimental psychology·2024

Same author

Reading text aloud benefits memory but not comprehension.

Memory & cognition·2023

Same author

The enactment effect: A systematic review and meta-analysis of behavioral, neuroimaging, and patient studies.

Psychological bulletin·2022

Same author

The production effect is consistent over material variations: support for the distinctiveness account.

Memory (Hove, England)·2022

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2025

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology

Published on: June 29, 2021

On the association between intention and visual word identification.

Derek Besner¹, Colin M MacLeod¹

¹Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo.

Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology = Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale

|April 11, 2024

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Cognitive psychology distinguishes controlled versus automatic processing. New research suggests intention, or task sets, significantly constrains automatic word identification, challenging the default automaticity view.

More Related Videos

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm

Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm

Published on: May 15, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2025

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology

Published on: June 29, 2021

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm

Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm

Published on: May 15, 2019

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience
Psycholinguistics

Background:

The automatic processing account of visual word identification posits that word recognition occurs without intention.
Intention is traditionally viewed as separate from stimulus identification, guiding action selection post-identification.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the role of intention, defined as a "task set," in the identification of single, well-formed letter strings.
To challenge the prevailing automaticity view by examining the relationship between intention and stimulus identification across various paradigms.

Main Methods:

Review and analysis of four experimental paradigms examining intention's influence on visual word identification.
Focus on how task sets modulate the process of identifying letter strings.

Main Results:

Evidence across paradigms indicates that intention (task set) significantly constrains stimulus identification.
The relationship between intention and identification is complex and not fully understood.
Automatic word processing is not a default system process.

Conclusions:

The automatic processing account of visual word identification is challenged by the demonstrable role of intention.
The interplay between task sets and stimulus identification is intricate and requires further research.
Automatic word processing, if it exists, is not an inherent default mechanism.