Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

301
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
301
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

282
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
282
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.4K
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

400
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
400
The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

6.0K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
6.0K
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Trial-level sequence modeling reveals hidden dynamics of dual-task interference.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

The Connection Between Associative Memory and Semantic Similarity: Evidence From Fan Experiments and Distributional Models.

Cognitive science·2026
Same author

Adult learning of a novel quantifier tracks semantic universals.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Decision-making components and times revealed by the single-trial electroencephalogram.

eLife·2025
Same author

Modeling the cognitive processes of accepting clinical decision support.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2025
Same author

Picosecond Stabilization of Transferred Charge Carriers at Plasmonic Metal-Molecule Interfaces.

Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)·2025
Same journal

Characterization of genomic diversity in bacteriophages infecting Rhodococcus.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Effectiveness of the Responding to Experienced and Anticipated Discrimination (READ) training on reducing stigma for medical students in Tunisia.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Cell-cell junction gene signatures as subtype-specific prognostic biomarkers in breast cancer.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

GC-MS based tentative identification of γ-sitosterol from Brassica nigra seeds and evaluation of its anticancer potential: An integrated in vitro and in silico study.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Ad-based social media interventions increase belief accuracy and generate pro-social opinions among non-news readers.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Negotiating knowledge: The role of network hedging in the production of high-impact science.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2025

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.2K

Probabilistic causal reasoning under time pressure.

Ivar R Kolvoort1,2,3, Elizabeth L Fisher1,4, Robert van Rooij2

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Plos One
|April 11, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Time pressure reduces accuracy and increases conservatism in causal reasoning, a speed-accuracy tradeoff. However, other reasoning errors like Markov violations remain unaffected, suggesting diverse cognitive mechanisms underlying causal judgments.

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.9K
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2025

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.2K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.9K
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Causal reasoning is fundamental to human cognition.
  • The temporal dynamics of causal reasoning are not well understood.
  • Investigating time pressure's impact can reveal underlying cognitive processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine how time pressure affects probabilistic causal inferences.
  • To identify which types of causal reasoning errors are sensitive to time constraints.
  • To explore the relationship between confidence and reasoning errors under time pressure.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted involving participants making probabilistic causal inferences.
  • Time pressure was systematically manipulated as an experimental variable.
  • Accuracy, response conservatism, Markov violations, and explanation failures were measured.

Main Results:

  • Increased time pressure led to decreased accuracy and more conservative responses (speed-accuracy tradeoff).
  • Markov violations and failures to explain away were unexpectedly insensitive to time pressure.
  • Low confidence correlated with conservative inferences, but not with Markov violations or explanation failures.

Conclusions:

  • Causal reasoning errors are not uniformly affected by time pressure, challenging existing theories.
  • The findings suggest that different causal reasoning errors stem from distinct cognitive mechanisms.
  • Causal judgments appear to be the product of multiple, interacting cognitive processes.