Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2025

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Preventive percutaneous coronary intervention versus optimal medical therapy alone for the treatment of vulnerable
Seung-Jung Park1, Jung-Min Ahn1, Do-Yoon Kang1
1Division of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Preventive percutaneous coronary intervention significantly reduced major adverse cardiac events in patients with non-flow-limiting vulnerable plaques. This focal therapy for vulnerable plaques shows promise in preventing cardiac events compared to optimal medical therapy alone.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Preventive Cardiology
Background:
- Vulnerable plaques, often non-flow-limiting, are a primary cause of acute coronary syndrome and sudden cardiac death.
- The efficacy of preventive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for these specific plaques remains largely unestablished.
- Assessing preventive PCI's role in high-risk, non-flow-limiting vulnerable plaques is crucial for improving patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of preventive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus optimal medical therapy (OMT) alone.
- To determine if PCI of non-flow-limiting vulnerable plaques reduces adverse cardiac events.
- To compare clinical outcomes between PCI plus OMT and OMT alone in a high-risk patient cohort.
Main Methods:
- A multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial (PREVENT) involving 1606 patients.
- Patients with non-flow-limiting vulnerable plaques (FFR >0.80) were randomized to PCI + OMT or OMT alone.
- The primary outcome was a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel MI, revascularisation, or unstable angina hospitalization at 2 years.
Main Results:
- Preventive PCI significantly reduced the primary composite outcome compared to OMT alone (0.4% vs 3.4%, p=0.0003).
- No significant difference was observed in serious adverse events, including death or myocardial infarction, between the groups at 2 years.
- The positive effect of preventive PCI was consistent across all components of the primary composite outcome.
Conclusions:
- Preventive percutaneous coronary intervention is effective in reducing major adverse cardiac events in patients with non-flow-limiting vulnerable plaques.
- These findings support the consideration of expanding PCI indications to include high-risk, non-flow-limiting vulnerable plaques.
- The PREVENT trial provides the first large-scale evidence for focal treatment of vulnerable plaques.
Related Concept Videos
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Ischemic Heart Disease: Overview
Atherosclerosis, the primary malefactor, orchestrates this dangerous condition. It manifests as the accumulation of fatty deposits, akin to insidious plaques, within arterial walls. As time elapses, these plaques metamorphose, hardening and...
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Calcium Channel Blockers
TKIs, such as imatinib (Gleevec), are particularly effective in tackling the growth and mitogenic factors that become upregulated in PAH patients. These factors contribute to the...

