Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2025

05:17
Author Spotlight: Enhancing the Offspring Health in Rats with Maternal Exercise During Pregnancy
Published on: April 5, 2024
749
The sedentary behavior reduction in pregnancy intervention (SPRING) pilot and feasibility randomized trial
Bethany Barone Gibbs1, Andrea C Kozai2,3, Shannon N McAdoo3
1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, West Virginia University School of Public Health, PO Box 9190, 64 Medical Center Drive, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA. bethany.gibbs@hsc.wvu.edu.
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
|April 11, 2024
Summary
This study shows a sedentary behavior reduction program is feasible and acceptable for pregnant individuals at risk for adverse outcomes. It effectively reduced sitting time and increased standing, offering an alternative to high-intensity exercise recommendations.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Public Health
- Behavioral Science
Background:
- Pregnant individuals often do not meet physical activity guidelines.
- High sedentary behavior during pregnancy is linked to adverse outcomes.
- Existing interventions may be too intense for some pregnant individuals.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the feasibility and acceptability of the Sedentary Behavior Reduction in Pregnancy Intervention (SPRING).
- To evaluate the initial efficacy of a lower-intensity intervention targeting reduced sedentary time, increased standing, and steps.
- To explore the impact on pregnancy health outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A pilot randomized trial with pregnant individuals at risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes.
- Intervention group received remote coaching, wearable monitor, adjustable workstation, and online support.
- Control group received no contact; outcomes assessed remotely via activPAL and medical records.
Main Results:
- High retention rates (90% and 83%) were observed.
- Intervention participants significantly decreased sedentary time (-0.84 h/day) and increased standing (+0.77 h/day).
- No significant increase in daily steps was observed compared to controls.
Conclusions:
- The SPRING intervention is feasible and acceptable for pregnant individuals at risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes.
- This lower-intensity approach may be a viable alternative to vigorous physical activity recommendations during pregnancy.
- Further investigation in a larger clinical trial is warranted.

