Quality assessment of amalgam and inlay restorations on posterior teeth: a retrospective study

This study was designed to assess and compare the quality of posterior proximo-occlusal amalgam and inlay restorations relative to type of restoration (material, surfaces involved, and cusp protection) and length of service of the restorations. A clinical evaluation system based on operationally defined and clinically important criteria was used. Clinically and statistically significant differences were found between overall ratings for amalgam and inlay restorations and between small (two-surface) amalgam and inlay restorations, as well as between larger (three-surface) amalgam and inlay restorations. In all cases, inlay restorations were of higher quality. A not acceptable rating for marginal integrity was the most frequent reason for not acceptable overall ratings. There was no difference in satisfactory/not acceptable ratings for inlay restorations with or without protected cusps (p = .95).