Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2025
Using the Visual World Paradigm to Study Sentence Comprehension in Mandarin-Speaking Children with Autism
Published on: October 3, 2018
Between bodily action and conventionalized structure: The neural mechanisms of constructed action in sign language
Doris Hernández1, Anna Puupponen2, Jarkko Keränen2
1Sign Language Centre, Department of Language and Communication, University of Jyväskylä, Finland; Center for Interdisciplinary Brain Research (CIBR), Department of Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
Abstract:
Sign languages (SLs) are expressed through different bodily actions, ranging from re-enactment of physical events (constructed action, CA) to sequences of lexical signs with internal structure (plain telling, PT). Despite the prevalence of CA in signed interactions and its significance for SL comprehension, its neural dynamics remain unexplored. We examined the processing of different types of CA (subtle, reduced, and overt) and PT in 35 adult deaf or hearing native signers. The electroencephalographic-based processing of signed sentences with incongruent targets was recorded. Attenuated N300 and early N400 were observed for CA in deaf but not in hearing signers. No differences were found between sentences with CA types in all signers, suggesting a continuum from PT to overt CA. Deaf signers focused more on body movements; hearing signers on faces. We conclude that CA is processed less effortlessly than PT, arguably because of its strong focus on bodily actions.
