Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2025

A Step-by-Step Implementation of DeepBehavior, Deep Learning Toolbox for Automated Behavior Analysis
Published on: February 6, 2020
A Vehicle-Edge-Cloud Framework for Computational Analysis of a Fine-Tuned Deep Learning Model
M Jalal Khan1,2, Manzoor Ahmed Khan1,2, Sherzod Turaev1
1College of Information Technology, United Arab Emirates University, Abu Dhabi 15551, United Arab Emirates.
Deploying deep learning models for autonomous vehicles requires careful consideration of computational layers. This study analyzes YOLOv8 performance across vehicle-edge-cloud architectures, finding consistent accuracy but varying inference times based on hardware and environment.
Area of Science:
- Computer Science
- Artificial Intelligence
- Robotics
Background:
- Cooperative, Connected, and Automated Mobility (CCAM) infrastructure is crucial for autonomous vehicle (AV) environmental perception in urban areas.
- Efficient deployment of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models is essential for enhancing AV performance within CCAM frameworks.
- The selection of computational processing layers and specific DL models impacts AV capabilities in complex environments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a computational framework for deploying DL models in CCAM infrastructure.
- To analyze the effectiveness of a custom-trained YOLOv8 DL model across diverse devices and layers in a vehicle-edge-cloud architecture.
- To investigate the trade-offs between DL model accuracy and execution time during deployment within the layered framework.
Main Methods:
- Developed a computational framework for deploying DL models within a vehicle-edge-cloud layered architecture.
- Evaluated a custom-trained YOLOv8 DL model across various computational layers and devices.
- Measured performance metrics including accuracy (mAP@0.5) and inference time under different environmental conditions and hardware configurations.
Main Results:
- DL model performance metrics (e.g., 0.842 mAP@0.5) remained consistent across different device types within any layer of the framework.
- Inference times for object detection tasks decreased under varied environmental conditions.
- Specific hardware configurations showed significant reductions in inference time: Jetson AGX (non-GPU) reduced time by 72% compared to Raspberry Pi (non-GPU), and Jetson AGX Xavier (GPU) reduced time by 90% compared to Jetson AGX ARMv8 (non-GPU).
Conclusions:
- The choice of computational layer and device significantly impacts DL model inference time, not its accuracy, in CCAM systems.
- Researchers and practitioners can leverage these findings to optimize DL model deployment for production AV systems.
- Selecting appropriate hardware and deployment environments is key to balancing performance and efficiency in AVs.
Related Concept Videos
End Point Prediction: Gran Plot
For potentiometric titration, the Gran plot is created by plotting...
Differential Leveling
Elastic Collisions: Case Study
Manipulation and Analysis

