Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2025

11:49
Cereal Crop Ear Counting in Field Conditions Using Zenithal RGB Images
Published on: February 2, 2019
9.3K
Intercomparison of Same-Day Remote Sensing Data for Measuring Winter Cover Crop Biophysical Traits
Alison Thieme1, Kusuma Prabhakara2, Jyoti Jennewein1
1Sustainable Agricultural Systems Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Bldg 001, BARC-W, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|April 13, 2024
Summary
Accurate winter cover crop monitoring using remote sensing is crucial for assessing environmental benefits. Surface reflectance satellite data closely matched ground-based measurements for estimating biomass and green cover, though active sensors require calibration.
Area of Science:
- Agricultural remote sensing
- Soil science
- Environmental monitoring
Background:
- Winter cover crops enhance soil health and reduce environmental impacts.
- Accurate biophysical trait estimation (biomass, groundcover) is vital for assessing cover crop benefits.
- Remote sensing offers a scalable approach to monitor cover crops.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare ground-based and satellite sensor measurements for estimating winter cover crop biophysical traits.
- To evaluate different satellite data processing levels (surface vs. top-of-atmosphere reflectance).
- To assess the interchangeability of various remote sensing platforms.
Main Methods:
- Paired satellite imagery (SPOT 5, Landsat 7, WorldView-2) and handheld multispectral sensors were used.
- Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) was calculated and compared between sensors and processing levels.
- Fractional green cover was compared to in-situ photographs, and biomass was estimated using NDVI calibration equations.
Main Results:
- Surface reflectance satellite data showed stronger correlations with proximal sensors than top-of-atmosphere data.
- Satellite-derived NDVI strongly agreed with passive handheld sensor estimates for fractional green cover and biomass.
- Active handheld sensors showed high accuracy but required intercept correction for data integration.
Conclusions:
- Passive multispectral remote sensing platforms can be used interchangeably for cover crop trait assessment, with minor adjustments for SPOT 5 NDVI.
- Active sensors may need separate calibration before combining with passive sensor data.
- Surface reflectance products are valuable, but cloud shadow detection needs improvement in satellite data processing.

