Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis and Treatment with Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab for COVID-19 among Immunocompromised Pediatric...

Background: Patients treated with hemato-oncological malignancies (HO) or undergoing cellular therapies such as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) or chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) were significantly affected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Despite the success of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, immunocompromised patients remain at increased risk for severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19), rendering this group of population a high priority for additional prevention and treatment options. Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab (TIXA/CILGA, AZD7442, Evusheld^®) is a combination of two fully human, long-acting monoclonal antibodies. TIXA/CILGA have been approved as pre-exposure prophylaxis and treatment in patients at risk of severe disease with impaired vaccine response. Our objective was to describe the efficacy and safety among immunocompromised pediatric patients. Methods: This was an observational multicenter cohort study of immunocompromised pediatric patients receiving TIXA/CILGA conducted at nine Polish centers of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation. We analyzed patients in two groups; those treated with HO and those undergoing cellular therapies: HSCT or CAR-T cells. In addition, two other cohorts were identified: patients given TIXA/CILGA as pre-exposure prophylactic and therapeutic intervention. Results: A total of 78 patients were evaluated during the study period: 69 (88.5%) received TIXA/CILGA as pre-exposure prophylaxis and 9 (11.5%) as a treatment strategy. A total of 52 (66.6%) patients were treated with standard chemotherapy at HO departments; 21 (27%) underwent HSCT, and 5 (6.4%) received CAR-T cell therapy. All children with COVID-19 receiving TIXA/CILGA presented a mild degree of severity. The most common clinical manifestations were fever, cough and coryza. At least one adverse event (AE) was reported in two (3.8%) patients excluding standard injection site reactions. Reported AEs were mild or moderate in intensity. One child reported mild myalgia and one reported moderate bone pain and weakness. Conclusions: In our observational multicenter cohort study, we explored the use of TIXA/CILGA as pre-exposure prophylaxis and treatment for COVID-19 among immunocompromised pediatric patients. While our findings suggest a potential benefit in preventing and managing COVID-19 in this vulnerable population, it is important to note the study's non-comparative design. Our results highlight the need for well-designed clinical trials to confirm these observations and further assess the efficacy and safety of TIXA/CILGA in immunocompromised children.