Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2025

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Variability in Definitions and Criteria of Extrauterine Growth Restriction and Its Association with
Clara González-López1, Gonzalo Solís-Sánchez1,2,3, Sonia Lareu-Vidal1,2
1Unidad de Neonatología, Área de Gestión Clínica de Pediatría, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, 33011 Oviedo, Spain.
Insights
Extrauterine growth restriction (EUGR) in preterm infants lacks a standard definition, hindering the prediction of neurodevelopmental outcomes. This review highlights the challenges in comparing studies due to varied EUGR criteria and outcome assessments.
Area of Science:
- Neonatalogy
- Pediatric Neurology
- Developmental Pediatrics
Background:
- Extrauterine growth restriction (EUGR) is recognized as inadequate growth in preterm infants.
- Current diagnostic criteria for EUGR exhibit significant variability, lacking standardization.
- There is no consensus on optimal assessment timing or growth monitoring tools for EUGR.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants diagnosed with EUGR.
- To compare different definitions of EUGR (cross-sectional, longitudinal, "true") in relation to neurodevelopmental outcomes.
- To identify challenges in comparing studies due to heterogeneity in EUGR definitions and outcome measures.
Main Methods:
- Narrative review of existing literature.
- Analysis of studies evaluating neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants with EUGR.
- Comparison of outcomes based on distinct EUGR definitions by weight.
Main Results:
- Significant variability exists in the criteria used to define EUGR across studies.
- Heterogeneity in neurodevelopmental outcome assessment methods complicates comparisons.
- Inconsistent definitions and assessment tools impede firm conclusions on the EUGR-neurodevelopmental outcome relationship.
Conclusions:
- The lack of standardized EUGR definitions and neurodevelopmental assessment methods hinders reliable outcome prediction.
- Further research with consistent criteria is needed to establish a clear link between EUGR definitions and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes.
- Standardization is crucial for accurate diagnosis, early intervention, and improved long-term outcomes for preterm infants.
Abstract:
Extrauterine growth restriction (EUGR) has been used in the literature and clinical practice to describe inadequate growth in preterm infants. Significant variability is seen in the criteria for EUGR, with no standard definition reached to date. Moreover, no consensus on the optimal timing for assessment or the ideal growth monitoring tool has been achieved, and an ongoing debate persists on the appropriate terminology to express poor postnatal growth. To ensure an adequate understanding of growth and early intervention in preterm infants at higher risk, it is critical to relate the diagnostic criteria of EUGR to the ability to predict adverse outcomes, such as neurodevelopmental outcomes. This narrative review was conducted to present evidence that evaluates neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants with EUGR, comparing separately the different definitions of this concept by weight (cross-sectional, longitudinal and "true" EUGR). In this article, we highlight the challenges of comparing various published studies on the subject, even when subclassifying by the definition of EUGR, due to the significant variability on the criteria used for each definition and for the evaluation of neurodevelopmental outcomes in different papers. This heterogeneity compromises the obtention of a single firm conclusion on the relation between different definitions of EUGR and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Teratogenicity
Nature and Nurture
Regression Toward the Mean
Neurulation

