Blood-based cardiometabolic phenotypes in atrial fibrillation and their associated risk: EAST-AFNET 4 biomolecule

Larissa Fabritz1,2,3,4,5, Winnie Chua5, Victor R Cardoso5

  • 1Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.

PubMed

Insights

Biomolecule patterns identify distinct patient groups with atrial fibrillation (AF), revealing varying cardiovascular risks. These cardiometabolic subphenotypes help stratify patients for better risk assessment and management.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology and Precision Medicine
  • Biomarker Discovery
  • Atrial Fibrillation Pathophysiology

Background:

  • Atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently coexists with cardiometabolic diseases, increasing risks of stroke, heart failure, and cardiovascular death.
  • Circulating biomolecules serve as quantifiable indicators of underlying cardiometabolic processes.
  • Identifying distinct patient subgroups within AF is crucial for personalized risk stratification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether combinations of circulating biomolecules can define distinct cardiometabolic phenotypes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).
  • To assess the cardiovascular event rates associated with these identified AF subphenotypes.
  • To validate the identified phenotypes and their associated risks in an independent cohort.

Main Methods:

  • Latent-class analysis was employed using baseline concentrations of 13 biomolecules in 1586 patients from the EAST-AFNET 4 study.
  • Biomolecules reflected processes including ageing, cardiac fibrosis, metabolic dysfunction, inflammation, and cardiac load.
  • Cardiovascular event rates were compared across identified clusters, with validation in the prospective BBC-AF cohort.

Main Results:

  • Unsupervised analysis identified four distinct clusters (subphenotypes) of AF patients based on biomolecule profiles.
  • The highest-risk cluster exhibited elevated levels of specific biomolecules (e.g., BMP10, IGFBP7, NT-proBNP, Ang-2, GDF-15) and had a five-fold higher cardiovascular event rate compared to the lowest-risk cluster.
  • Intermediate-risk clusters were differentiated by inflammatory markers (CRP, IL-6) and coagulation markers (D-dimer); early rhythm control was effective across all identified subphenotypes.

Conclusions:

  • Circulating biomolecule concentrations effectively identify distinct cardiometabolic subphenotypes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).
  • These subphenotypes correlate with significant differences in cardiovascular risk, enabling better patient stratification.
  • The findings support the use of biomolecular profiling for personalized risk assessment in AF management.
Abstract