Balanced medial-lateral wall vs selective 3-wall orbital decompression for sight-threatening Graves's orbitopathy: a...

Although urgent orbital decompression surgery for sight-threatening Graves' orbitopathy unresponsive to available medical treatments continues to evolve, post-operative new-onset or worsened pre-operative strabismus or diplopia remains a significant complication. At present, the optimal surgical technique remains debatable. Here, we sought to compare long-term outcomes after balanced medial-lateral wall versus selective 3-wall decompression as an urgent treatment for unresponsive sight-threatening GO.

This retrospective study examined the post-operative outcome of 102 eyes (57 patients) that underwent urgent orbital decompression for sight-threatening GO. Treatment effectiveness was measured by visual acuity, proptosis, perimetry, and strabismus/diplopia, while fundus findings were detected by fundus color photography and optical coherence tomography and followed up for more than 12 months.

Fifty-seven patients (102 orbits) with an average age of 52.7 ± 10.2 years were evaluated. Balanced medial-lateral wall (BMLW-OD) or selective 3-wall decompression(S3W-OD) were performed in 54 and 48 eyes, respectively. Twelve months after orbital decompression, all parameters significantly improved in both groups, including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), mean defect of visual field (VF-MD), pattern standard deviation of visual field (VF-PSD), and proptosis (all P < 0.01). However, new-onset esotropia occurred in 25.8% and 3.8% of patients who underwent BMLW-OD surgery or S3W-OD, respectively. Moreover, 6.5% and 38.5% of patients improved after decompression in the medial-lateral wall decompression group and the selective 3-wall decompression group, respectively.

We demonstrated that S3W-OD provides a lower rate of new-onset strabismus/diplopia as compared with BMLW-OD surgery, while still allowing for satisfactory visual outcomes.

: NCT05627401. Date of registration: November 25, 2022.