Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Open and closed-loop control systems01:17

Open and closed-loop control systems

732
Control systems are foundational elements in automation and engineering. They are broadly categorized into open-loop and closed-loop systems. These classifications hinge on the presence or absence of feedback mechanisms, significantly influencing the system's performance, complexity, and application.
An open-loop control system operates without feedback from the output. It consists of two primary elements: the controller and the controlled process. The controller receives an input signal...
732
Feedback control systems01:26

Feedback control systems

307
Feedback control systems are categorized in various ways based on their design, analysis, and signal types.
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...
307
Multi-input and Multi-variable systems01:22

Multi-input and Multi-variable systems

106
Cruise control systems in cars are designed as multi-input systems to maintain a driver's desired speed while compensating for external disturbances such as changes in terrain. The block diagram for a cruise control system typically includes two main inputs: the desired speed set by the driver and any external disturbances, such as the incline of the road. By adjusting the engine throttle, the system maintains the vehicle's speed as close to the desired value as possible.
In the absence...
106
Root-Locus Method01:19

Root-Locus Method

148
A cruise control system in a car is designed to maintain a specified speed automatically by adjusting the gas pedal. The system continuously measures the vehicle's speed and makes fine adjustments to the pedal to achieve this goal. The root locus method is particularly useful for understanding how the cruise control system's behavior changes under varying conditions, such as when the car goes uphill, downhill, or faces strong wind resistance.
This system can be represented by a block...
148
Controller Configurations01:22

Controller Configurations

95
Controller configurations are crucial in a car's cruise control system because they manage speed over time to maintain a consistent pace regardless of road conditions, thereby meeting design goals. In traditional control systems, fixed-configuration design involves predetermined controller placement. System performance modifications are known as compensation.
Control-system compensation involves various configurations, most commonly series or cascade compensation, in which the controller...
95
PD Controller: Design01:26

PD Controller: Design

223
In automotive engineering, car suspension systems often employ Proportional Derivative (PD) controllers to enhance performance. PD controllers are utilized to adjust the damping force in response to road conditions. A controller, acting as an amplifier with a constant gain, demonstrates proportional control, with output directly mirroring input.
Designing a continuous-data controller requires selecting and linking components like adders and integrators, which are fundamental in Proportional,...
223

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

LLM-enhanced causal graph learning for real-time crash risk prediction.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
Same author

Spatiotemporal analysis of urban traffic crash risk using a bagging-optimized dynamic mode decomposition framework.

Traffic injury prevention·2026
Same author

A comprehensive analysis of contributing factors in bus crashes: integrating passenger injury severity and vehicle damage severity using the Frank copula model.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
Same author

Multi-level signal-vehicle cooperative control to improve safety and efficiency for arterial intersections in mixed-autonomy traffic.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
Same author

Human-machine shared driving for vehicle collision avoidance based on Hamilton-Jacobi reachability.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
Same author

Zone-specific real-time traffic conflict risk modeling for freeway tunnels: a CrossTabNet approach.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2025

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

4.5K

A variable speed limit control approach for freeway tunnels based on the model-based reinforcement learning framework

Jieling Jin1, Ye Li1, Helai Huang1

  • 1School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China.

Accident; Analysis and Prevention
|April 13, 2024
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new variable speed limit (VSL) strategy using model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) with safety perception to enhance freeway tunnel traffic safety and efficiency. The MBRL approach significantly improves safety and efficiency compared to traditional methods.

Keywords:
Crash risk predictionFreeway tunnelsModel-based reinforcement learningMultilane cell transmission modelVariable speed limits

More Related Videos

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control
08:18

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

5.0K
Using a Virtual Reality Walking Simulator to Investigate Pedestrian Behavior
06:38

Using a Virtual Reality Walking Simulator to Investigate Pedestrian Behavior

Published on: June 9, 2020

4.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2025

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

4.5K
WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control
08:18

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

5.0K
Using a Virtual Reality Walking Simulator to Investigate Pedestrian Behavior
06:38

Using a Virtual Reality Walking Simulator to Investigate Pedestrian Behavior

Published on: June 9, 2020

4.9K

Area of Science:

  • Traffic Engineering
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Control Systems

Background:

  • Freeway tunnels face challenges in maintaining traffic safety and efficiency.
  • Traditional variable speed limit (VSL) strategies have limitations in adapting to real-time conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel VSL control strategy for freeway tunnels using model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) with safety perception.
  • To enhance traffic safety and efficiency in freeway tunnels through an advanced VSL approach.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a multi-lane cell transmission model for freeway tunnels as an environment model for MBRL.
  • Integrated a real-time crash risk prediction model with random deep and cross networks for safety perception.
  • Trained the VSL control agent using a deep dyna-Q method with a safety trigger mechanism.

Main Results:

  • The proposed VSL strategies increased traffic safety by 16.00%-20.00% and efficiency by 3.00%-6.50% compared to fixed speed limits.
  • Outperformed traditional VSL strategies based on traffic flow prediction and model-free reinforcement learning.
  • VSL strategies with safety triggers demonstrated superior safety compared to those without.

Conclusions:

  • MBRL-based VSL strategies with safety perception offer significant improvements in freeway tunnel traffic safety and efficiency.
  • The developed strategy is effective and adaptable to current tunnel application conditions.
  • This approach shows strong potential for real-world implementation in intelligent transportation systems.