Prognostic factors and treatment responses among patients with gross residual disease in differentiated thyroid cancer
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 21, 2026
Computer-Aided Three-Dimensional Visualization in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Thyroid Cancer
Published on: June 9, 2023
Yvonne Ee Wern Chiew1, Yi-Ting Yang1, Shun-Yu Chi2
1Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC.
Background:
Various postoperative staging systems were developed to assess the outcome of differentiated thyroid cancer from initial risk after surgery to dynamic changing prognosis during follow-up. The objective of our retrospective cohort study was to identify risk factors contributing to macroscopic positive surgical margin (R2 resection) and parameters in discriminating the treatment responses and prognosis among R2 patients.
Methods:
In total, 242 differentiated thyroid cancer patients with extrathyroidal extension who underwent a thyroidectomy at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital between January 2013 and July 2018, were included. The patients were grouped according to the presence or absence of gross residual disease (R2). The R2 patients were further classified into two categories according to their treatment response into excellent and nonexcellent groups. The parameters and treatment outcomes were compared between these groups.
Results:
The mean follow-up time was 45.3 months. Two hundred seven (85.5%) patients had either surgery-free or microscopic margins (R0/R1), while 35 (14.5%) had R2 resection. In the R2 group (n = 35), 15 (42.9%) patients achieved an excellent response, while 20 (57.1%) achieved a nonexcellent response. Statistically significant differences were observed in the extent of neck dissection, TSH-Tg level, post-RAI Tg level, nodal status, and recurrence between the two groups. The Kaplan-Meier curves for 5-year local and distant recurrence-free survival of R0/R1 versus R2 patients were 90.0% versus 66.3%, and 98.4% versus 90.7%, respectively ( p < 0.001). Among the R2 patients, the excellent responders had a higher local recurrence-free survival than nonexcellent responders (93.3% vs. 45.1%, p = 0.008).
Conclusion:
There are significant disparities in recurrence-free survival among R2 patients with different treatment responses. The nodal status of papillary thyroid cancer and thyroglobulin level after thyroidectomy and RAI were factors contributing to difference in their treatment responses.
