Clinical outcomes of on-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery: a meta-analysis

The ongoing debate regarding off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and on-pump CABG has endured for over three decades. Although numerous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses have been reported, new evidence has emerged. Therefore, an updated and comprehensive meta-analysis to guide clinical practice is essential.

A comprehensive search for eligible articles published after 2000, reporting RCTs involving at least 100 patients and comparing off-pump CABG with on-pump CABG, was performed throughout the databases including Embase, Ovid Medline, and Web of Science. The primary interested outcomes included the short-term incidence of stroke and long-term mortality. The primary analysis utilized fixed-effect model with the inverse variance method. The Grade of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to evaluate the certainty of evidence.

After thorough screening, 39 articles were included, consisting of 28 RCTs and involving a total of 16 090 patients. Off-pump CABG significantly reduced the incidence of short-term stroke (1.27 vs. 1.78%, OR: 0.74, P =0.03, high certainty). However, it was observed to be associated with increased mid-term coronary reintervention (2.77 vs. 1.85%, RR: 1.49, P <0.01, high certainty) and long-term mortality (21.8 vs. 21.0%, RR: 1.09, P =0.02, moderate certainty).

Off-pump CABG significantly reduces the short-term incidence of stroke, but it also increases the incidence of mid-term coronary reintervention. Moreover, it may increase long-term mortality.