Correlation between sentinel lymph node biopsy and non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with cN0 breast carcinoma: comparison of invasive ductal carcinoma and invasive lobular carcinoma
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes have a higher risk of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis compared to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Further research is needed before omitting axillary lymph node dissection in ILC cases.
Area Of Science
- Oncology
- Surgical Pathology
- Breast Cancer Research
Background
- Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) avoidance is debated for cN0 breast cancer with 1-2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs).
- Limited data exist for invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) patients, making ALND omission controversial.
- This study investigates metastasis patterns in ILC versus invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC).
Purpose Of The Study
- To compare the frequency of non-sentinel lymph node (non-SLN) metastases between ILC and IDC.
- To identify factors influencing non-SLN metastasis in breast cancer subtypes.
- To inform clinical decisions regarding ALND in ILC patients.
Main Methods
- Retrospective analysis of 2583 breast cancer patients (2012-2023).
- Comparison of SLN and non-SLN metastasis rates between ILC (341 patients) and IDC (2242 patients).
- Multivariate analysis to determine predictors of non-SLN metastasis.
Main Results
- SLN metastasis rates were similar: 24.8% for ILC and 22.8% for IDC.
- Non-SLN metastasis was significantly higher in ILC (66.7%) compared to IDC (45%) (p=0.02).
- ILC was identified as the strongest predictor of non-SLN metastasis.
Conclusions
- ILC patients with positive SLNs exhibit a higher incidence of non-SLN metastasis than IDC patients.
- ILC status is crucial for predicting non-SLN positivity in cases with SLN macrometastasis.
- Omitting ALND in ILC patients with 1-2 positive SLNs requires further investigation.

