Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Prediction Under Interventions: Evaluation of Counterfactual Performance Using Longitudinal Observational Data.
Ruth H Keogh1, Nan Van Geloven2
1From the Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Evaluating predictions under interventions is challenging with observational data. This study introduces methods to assess counterfactual performance for time-to-event outcomes, aiding medical decision-making.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Epidemiology
- Health Informatics
Background:
- Evaluating predictive models for medical decision-making is crucial.
- Standard performance evaluation methods are inadequate for observational data under interventions.
- Predictions under interventions estimate outcomes if a specific treatment strategy were followed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate methods for assessing the counterfactual performance of predictions under interventions for time-to-event outcomes.
- To adapt standard performance measures for counterfactual evaluation using longitudinal observational data.
- To support informed medical decision-making by quantifying prediction performance under hypothetical treatment strategies.
Main Methods:
- Utilized artificial censoring and inverse probability weighting to create a validation dataset mimicking the intervention strategy.
- Extended established performance metrics including calibration, discrimination (c-index, cumulative/dynamic AUCt), and Brier score.
- Employed a simulation study to validate the proposed methods and assess their ability to detect poor performance.
Main Results:
- The proposed methods successfully evaluate counterfactual performance for time-to-event predictions under interventions.
- Extended metrics demonstrated effectiveness in assessing calibration, discrimination, and overall prediction error.
- The approach was successfully applied to liver transplantation data, quantifying prediction performance for organ allocation decisions.
Conclusions:
- This work provides a robust framework for evaluating counterfactual prediction performance using observational data.
- The developed methods enhance the reliability of predictions used in medical decision-making, particularly for time-to-event outcomes.
- Quantifying prediction performance under interventions is essential for critical applications like organ allocation.
More Related Videos
07:01Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
Published on: September 20, 2020
07:20Author Spotlight: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Movement Observation in Cerebral Palsy
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Longitudinal Research
Longitudinal Studies
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
Naturalistic Observations
Data Collection by Observations
An astronomer viewing the motion and brightness of stars in the sky and recording the data is an example of observational data collection. A botanist recording...
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.