Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Deindividuation00:57

Deindividuation

26.4K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.4K
Principle of Moments: Problem Solving01:30

Principle of Moments: Problem Solving

839
The principle of moments is a fundamental concept in physics and engineering. It refers to the balancing of forces and moments around a point or axis, also known as the pivot. This principle is used in many real-life scenarios, including construction, sports, and daily activities like opening doors and pushing objects.
One such scenario involves a pole placed in a three-dimensional system with a cable attached. When a tension is applied to the cable, the moment about the z-axis passing through...
839
Bystander Effect02:09

Bystander Effect

9.6K
The discussion of bullying highlights the problem of witnesses not intervening to help a victim. This is a common occurrence, as the following well-publicized event demonstrates. In 1964, in Queens, New York, a 19-year-old woman named Kitty Genovese was attacked by a person with a knife near the back entrance to her apartment building and again in the hallway inside her apartment building. When the attack occurred, she screamed for help numerous times and eventually died from her stab wounds.
9.6K
Nonconscious Mimicry01:13

Nonconscious Mimicry

4.6K
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
4.6K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.9K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.9K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Human hippocampal ripples tune cortical responses based on predicted uncertainty.

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same author

The wisdom of crowds emerges in flocks of thousands of migrating songbirds.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Testing and tracking in the UK: A dynamic causal modelling study.

Wellcome open research·2026
Same author

The evolutionary and organizational bases of active affordance.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same author

The methodological foundations of lesion network mapping remain sound.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Chimpanzees spontaneously prepare for mutually exclusive possibilities, and collective context strengthens this behaviour.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

In This Issue.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Correction for Otsuki et al., Extracellular sulfatases support cartilage homeostasis by regulating BMP and FGF signaling pathways.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Hive mind: Microbial communities and the making of memory.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Targets for disease modification in schizophrenia: New findings add to evidence for the involvement of the immune complement system.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Correction for Wang et al., The role of reduced aerosol masking from air pollutant emission reductions in recent global warming acceleration (2013-2023).

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Correction for Mishra, Ecology is not yet ready for AI-and why that matters.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.3K

Collective behavior from surprise minimization.

Conor Heins1,2,3,4, Beren Millidge5, Lancelot Da Costa4,6,7

  • 1Department of Collective Behaviour, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Konstanz D-78457, Germany.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|April 17, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces active inference to model collective animal behavior, showing that minimizing surprise naturally generates group movement patterns like cohesion and directed motion without predefined rules.

Keywords:
Bayesian inferenceactive inferenceagent-based modelsanimal behaviorcollective motion

More Related Videos

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

15.2K
A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents
08:38

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents

Published on: November 21, 2019

7.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.3K
Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

15.2K
A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents
08:38

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents

Published on: November 21, 2019

7.6K

Area of Science:

  • Collective behavior
  • Computational neuroscience
  • Theoretical ecology

Background:

  • Collective motion is common in nature, with models often using self-propelled particles and social forces.
  • Organisms are probabilistic decision-makers, not simple particles.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce active inference as a novel framework for modeling collective behavior.
  • To demonstrate how minimizing surprise can explain emergent group dynamics.
  • To explore the relationship between individual beliefs and collective properties.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a computational model based on active inference and active Bayesian inference.
  • Simulated agents driven by the imperative to minimize surprise.
  • Analyzed emergent group phenomena such as cohesion, milling, and directed motion.
  • Explored parameter spaces to link individual beliefs to group characteristics.

Main Results:

  • Collective phenomena like cohesion and directed motion emerge naturally from the active inference framework.
  • Active inference unifies and generalizes classical 'social force' models.
  • Individual beliefs about uncertainty influence collective decision-making accuracy.
  • Agents can update their models, leading to more robust information encoding and sensitivity to fluctuations.

Conclusions:

  • Active inference provides a unified cognitive framework for understanding collective behavior.
  • This approach offers a powerful alternative to traditional particle-based models.
  • The model highlights the role of individual belief updating in group dynamics and information processing.