Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Caused by Crossing Vessels in Infants and Young Children

Dongyan Zhao1, Long Sun1, Chang Tao1

  • 1Department of Urology, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou 310000, China.

PubMed

Insights

Crossing vessels (CV) causing ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) are common in infants and young children. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) is recommended as open pyeloplasty (OP) may miss these critical vascular anomalies.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Urology
  • Surgical Innovation
  • Vascular Anatomy

Background:

  • Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is a common congenital anomaly in children.
  • Crossing vessels (CV) are a frequent cause of UPJO, particularly in younger patients.
  • Accurate diagnosis and surgical management are crucial for preserving renal function.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the clinical characteristics of UPJO caused by CV in infants and young children.
  • To compare the detection rates of CV in laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) versus open pyeloplasty (OP).
  • To evaluate the impact of age on CV presentation and surgical outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 747 children with UPJO who underwent primary surgery.
  • Classification into laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) and open pyeloplasty (OP) groups.
  • Stratification by age (≤3 years vs. >3 years) and identification of CV-caused UPJO cases.

Main Results:

  • Ninety cases of CV-associated UPJO were identified.
  • CV discovery rate was significantly higher in the LP group (17.1%) compared to the OP group (4.1%) (P < 0.001).
  • No significant difference in CV discovery rates was observed between age groups (≤3 vs. >3 years) within the LP group. Preoperative confirmation of CV was absent in the ≤3 group.

Conclusions:

  • Crossing vessels are not rare in infants and young children with UPJO and occur across all age groups.
  • Laparoscopic pyeloplasty is recommended due to a higher likelihood of detecting CV compared to open pyeloplasty.
  • Failure to detect CV during open pyeloplasty can lead to reoperation.
Abstract