Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Principles of Pharmacogenetics: Types of Genetic Variants01:27

Principles of Pharmacogenetics: Types of Genetic Variants

The human genome is over 99.9% identical between individuals, yet genetic differences exist at millions of bases. The human genome contains approximately 3 million variant positions per individual, many of which are heterozygous, contributing to genetic diversity and individual traits. Genetic variations include single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), insertions, deletions, and copy number variations (CNVs).SNPs, the most common variation, involve single-base changes in DNA. These can be...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multi-ancestry transcriptome-wide association studies uncover insights into breast cancer genetics and biology.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With BRCA+ or PALB2+ Pancreatic Cancer Treated With Maintenance Rucaparib: A Secondary Analysis of a Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA oncology·2026
Same author

Comparative analysis of distinct genomic landscapes in young-onset gBRCA1/2 breast cancer.

JCI insight·2026
Same author

A randomized study of digital versus genetic counselor return of actionable genetic research results to biobank participants (RESPECT3 study).

BMC medical ethics·2026
Same author

Homologous recombination deficiency and hemizygosity drive resistance in breast cancer.

Nature·2026
Same author

Rational Design of Immune Gene Therapy Combinations via In Vivo CRISPR Activation Screen of Tumor Microenvironment Modulators.

Cancer discovery·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease
09:34

Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease

Published on: April 4, 2018

33.7K

Real-world evaluation of deep learning algorithms to classify functional pathogenic germline variants.

Ryan D Chow1, Ravi B Parikh2,3,4,5, Katherine L Nathanson6,7

  • 1Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Medrxiv : the Preprint Server for Health Sciences
|April 18, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Deep learning models show promise in predicting hereditary breast cancer risk for BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 variants. However, their clinical utility for variants of uncertain significance remains limited.

More Related Videos

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
07:15

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

11.0K
In Vivo Functional Study of Disease-associated Rare Human Variants Using Drosophila
00:06

In Vivo Functional Study of Disease-associated Rare Human Variants Using Drosophila

Published on: August 20, 2019

13.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease
09:34

Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease

Published on: April 4, 2018

33.7K
Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
07:15

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

11.0K
In Vivo Functional Study of Disease-associated Rare Human Variants Using Drosophila
00:06

In Vivo Functional Study of Disease-associated Rare Human Variants Using Drosophila

Published on: August 20, 2019

13.6K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Computational Biology
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Deep learning models for variant pathogenicity prediction are effective on curated data but underexplored in real-world disease phenotypes.
  • Assessing the clinical utility of these models for hereditary cancer risk prediction is crucial.

Approach:

  • Applied three state-of-the-art deep learning pathogenicity prediction models to classify hereditary breast cancer gene variants.
  • Utilized data from the UK Biobank for real-world phenotype association.
  • Explored gene-specific score thresholds to optimize model performance.

Key Points:

  • Predicted pathogenic variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 were associated with increased breast cancer risk.
  • No significant association was found for ATM and CHEK2 variants.
  • Optimizing gene-specific score thresholds improved model performance.

Conclusions:

  • Deep learning models show potential for identifying pathogenic variants in key breast cancer genes.
  • The models demonstrated limited clinical utility for classifying variants of uncertain significance.
  • Further refinement is needed to enhance the real-world clinical application of these predictive tools.