Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2025

10:28
Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
5.0K
Assessment of ICD eligibility in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy patients: a position statement by the Task Force of the
Anne-Lotte C J van der Lingen1, Tom E Verstraelen2, Lieselot van Erven3
1Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Summary
International guidelines suggest implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) for non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) patients. This study proposes refining these recommendations by considering additional risk factors for arrhythmic and non-arrhythmic death.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- International guidelines recommend implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) for non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 35%.
- Current recommendations do not fully account for all risk factors influencing mortality in NICM.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose refined recommendations for ICD implantation in NICM patients.
- To incorporate additional risk parameters for both arrhythmic and non-arrhythmic death.
Main Methods:
- Consideration of late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac MRI for arrhythmic risk assessment.
- Inclusion of genetic testing for high-risk variants to evaluate arrhythmic risk.
- Assessment of non-arrhythmic mortality risk using age, comorbidities, and sex.
- Evaluation of risk modifiers like concomitant arrhythmias and resynchronisation therapy.
Main Results:
- The proposed approach allows for more nuanced risk stratification in NICM patients.
- It may lead to withholding ICD implantation in patients with low arrhythmic risk but high non-arrhythmic mortality risk.
- No definitive cut-off values have been established yet.
Conclusions:
- Refining ICD implantation guidelines for NICM is crucial.
- Integrating comprehensive risk assessment, including imaging, genetics, and clinical factors, improves patient selection.
- Personalized risk assessment can optimize treatment decisions and resource allocation.

