Nativity Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Hispanics in the United States
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Foreign-born Hispanics show lower colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates than non-Hispanic Whites, even after accounting for socioeconomic factors. Targeted interventions are crucial for this group to improve CRC early detection and prevention.
Area Of Science
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Cancer Prevention
Background
- Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake is lower in U.S. Hispanics compared to non-Hispanic Whites.
- Disparities are more pronounced in foreign-born Hispanics, but recent trends and socioeconomic influences are unclear.
Purpose Of The Study
- To evaluate changes in CRC screening disparities between foreign-born and U.S.-born Hispanics and U.S.-born non-Hispanic Whites over two decades.
- To determine if these disparities persist after adjusting for socioeconomic and demographic factors.
Main Methods
- Utilized 2019 National Health Interview Survey data.
- Compared CRC screening adherence using weighted log-linked binomial regression.
- Analyzed screening prevalence across Hispanic nativity subgroups and U.S.-born non-Hispanic Whites.
Main Results
- Unadjusted CRC screening prevalence was significantly lower in both foreign-born (47.18%) and U.S.-born (64.18%) Hispanics versus U.S.-born non-Hispanic Whites (70.70%).
- After adjustment, foreign-born Hispanics still had lower screening prevalence (APR 0.80; 95% CI 0.70-0.91) compared to U.S.-born non-Hispanic Whites.
- No significant difference in screening was found between U.S.-born Hispanics and U.S.-born non-Hispanic Whites post-adjustment.
Conclusions
- Low CRC screening uptake persists in foreign-born Hispanics, independent of socioeconomic and demographic factors.
- Interventions targeting foreign-born Hispanics are essential to reduce CRC disparities.
- Promoting early detection and prevention in this population is critical, irrespective of socioeconomic status.
Related Concept Videos
Gastrointestinal (GI) diagnostic studies are pivotal in confirming, ruling out, diagnosing, or staging various diseases, including cancers. Following diagnosis, allocating time for discussions with the patient and providing informational resources is crucial. Diagnostic assessments of the GI tract often occur in outpatient settings like endoscopy suites or GI labs. Preparation for these tests may include dietary restrictions, fasting, liquid bowel preparations, laxatives, enemas, and the...
The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can...

