Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Weighted Mean00:57

Weighted Mean

5.1K
While taking the arithmetic, geometric, or harmonic mean of a sample data set, equal importance is assigned to all the data points. However, all the values may not always be equally important in some data sets. An intrinsic bias might make it more important to give more weightage to specific values over others.
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
5.1K
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

162
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
162
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

116
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
116
Imbalances in Cardiac Output01:26

Imbalances in Cardiac Output

1.4K
The heart's primary function is to pump blood throughout the body, maintaining a balance between blood sent out (cardiac output) and blood returning (venous return). If this balance is disrupted, it can result in congestive heart failure (CHF), a severe condition where the heart becomes an inefficient pump, leading to inadequate blood circulation.
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send...
1.4K
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions01:29

Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions

2.2K
Creating and executing a nursing diagnosis helps nurses plan care and guide patient, family, and community interventions. They are developed based on a patient's physical evaluation and support measuring the outcomes. It is not recommended to select random interventions throughout the planning process. Instead, consider the following six essential factors when choosing interventions:
2.2K
Anorexia Nervosa01:28

Anorexia Nervosa

62
Anorexia nervosa is a complex and severe eating disorder characterized by an intense fear of weight gain, an unrelenting pursuit of thinness, and a distorted body image. It often leads to dangerously low body weight relative to an individual's age and height. This disorder is marked by significant physical and psychological consequences, making it one of the most life-threatening psychiatric illnesses.
Symptoms and Physical Effects
Individuals with anorexia nervosa commonly exhibit extreme...
62

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fair processes for financing universal health coverage?

Health economics, policy, and law·2024
Same author

Proxy Preferences and the Values of Children's Health States.

PharmacoEconomics·2024
Same author

Eliciting preferences and respecting values: Why ask?

Social science & medicine (1982)·2023
Same author

Is there a human right to essential health care?

Developing world bioethics·2022
Same author

Challenge Trials: What Are the Ethical Problems?

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2020
Same author

The Paradoxes of Respectful Guidance: A Comment on Kenneth V. Iserson, "Do you Believe in Magic? Shove, Don't Nudge: Advising Patients at the Bedside".

The Journal of clinical ethics·2020
Same journal

From presence to participation: Ethical engagement in community advisory boards for drug use research.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Why we need political values in epidemic modelling: parameters, populations, and public health policy goals.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Physical activity, indoor air pollution, and cognitive function among older-adults in India: Evidence of gendered environmental disadvantage.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

The gendered burden of natural disasters: Evidence from two catastrophic earthquakes in Türkiye.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Epidemiologic approaches to policy research - examinations of single policies, policy clusters, and policy climates: Conceptualization, measurement, and analysis.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Time to check up: Retirement and cancer screening in Australia.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K

Problems with NICE's severity weights.

Daniel M Hausman1

  • 1Center for Population-Level Bioethics, Rutgers University, 112 Paterson Street, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, United States.

Social Science & Medicine (1982)
|April 18, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

NICE

More Related Videos

Establishing a Mouse Contusion Spinal Cord Injury Model Based on a Minimally Invasive Technique
07:17

Establishing a Mouse Contusion Spinal Cord Injury Model Based on a Minimally Invasive Technique

Published on: September 7, 2022

4.9K
Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research
08:33

Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research

Published on: January 5, 2024

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K
Establishing a Mouse Contusion Spinal Cord Injury Model Based on a Minimally Invasive Technique
07:17

Establishing a Mouse Contusion Spinal Cord Injury Model Based on a Minimally Invasive Technique

Published on: September 7, 2022

4.9K
Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research
08:33

Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research

Published on: January 5, 2024

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Health economics
  • Medical ethics
  • Health technology assessment

Background:

  • The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the U.K. utilizes severity weighting in its technology assessments.
  • This involves assigning additional weights to health conditions with significant shortfalls in Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine the implications, plausibility, and justification of NICE's severity weighting policy.
  • To evaluate the ethical and philosophical underpinnings of this approach to health technology assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of severity prioritization in health economics and political philosophy.
  • Conceptual analysis of NICE's severity weighting criteria.
  • Ethical evaluation based on egalitarian and prioritarian frameworks.

Main Results:

  • The current severity weighting by NICE, focusing on future QALY shortfalls, lacks robust support.
  • Existing literature on severity attitudes may not directly justify NICE's specific weighting approach.
  • The policy's focus on future health and neglect of general well-being raises ethical concerns.

Conclusions:

  • NICE's severity weighting policy requires re-evaluation due to questionable justification and troubling implications.
  • A broader ethical framework considering overall well-being and past/present health may be more appropriate.