Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2025

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Development and validation of a new algorithm for improved cardiovascular risk prediction
Julia Hippisley-Cox1, Carol A C Coupland2,3, Mona Bafadhel4
1Nuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. julia.hippisley-cox@phc.ox.ac.uk.
Insights
A new QR4 algorithm improves cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction by incorporating novel factors like certain cancers and Down syndrome. This tool offers superior 10-year CVD risk estimation for men and women in the UK compared to existing scores.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a leading cause of mortality globally.
- Existing risk prediction algorithms, such as QRISK3, provide valuable tools for clinicians.
- There is a continuous need to refine CVD risk assessment by incorporating novel risk factors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To derive and externally validate a new cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk algorithm, named QR4.
- To incorporate novel risk factors into CVD risk prediction separately for men and women.
- To compare the performance of QR4 against existing CVD risk scores like QRISK3, SCORE2, and ASCVD.
Main Methods:
- Utilized health data from 9.98 million UK adults for algorithm derivation and 6.79 million for external validation.
- Employed cause-specific Cox models to develop predictive models for 10-year CVD risk.
- Externally validated the QR4 algorithm and compared its performance (C-statistic) against QRISK3, SCORE2, and ASCVD risk scores.
Main Results:
- Identified seven novel risk factors for both men and women (e.g., brain cancer, lung cancer, Down syndrome, COPD) and two additional for women (pre-eclampsia, postnatal depression).
- QR4 demonstrated a higher C-statistic than QRISK3 in both women (0.835 vs. 0.831) and men (0.814 vs. 0.812) upon external validation.
- QR4 exhibited superior accuracy compared to ASCVD and SCORE2 risk scores in both sexes.
Conclusions:
- The QR4 algorithm offers enhanced cardiovascular disease risk prediction in the UK population.
- Incorporation of novel risk factors significantly improves the accuracy of CVD risk assessment.
- QR4 identifies new at-risk groups and provides a more precise tool for clinical decision-making compared to international scoring systems.
Abstract:
QRISK algorithms use data from millions of people to help clinicians identify individuals at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Here, we derive and externally validate a new algorithm, which we have named QR4, that incorporates novel risk factors to estimate 10-year CVD risk separately for men and women. Health data from 9.98 million and 6.79 million adults from the United Kingdom were used for derivation and validation of the algorithm, respectively. Cause-specific Cox models were used to develop models to predict CVD risk, and the performance of QR4 was compared with version 3 of QRISK, Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE2) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk scores. We identified seven novel risk factors in models for both men and women (brain cancer, lung cancer, Down syndrome, blood cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, oral cancer and learning disability) and two additional novel risk factors in women (pre-eclampsia and postnatal depression). On external validation, QR4 had a higher C statistic than QRISK3 in both women (0.835 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.833-0.837) and 0.831 (95% CI, 0.829-0.832) for QR4 and QRISK3, respectively) and men (0.814 (95% CI, 0.812-0.816) and 0.812 (95% CI, 0.810-0.814) for QR4 and QRISK3, respectively). QR4 was also more accurate than the ASCVD and SCORE2 risk scores in both men and women. The QR4 risk score identifies new risk groups and provides superior CVD risk prediction in the United Kingdom compared with other international scoring systems for CVD risk.
Related Concept Videos
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...

