Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Weighted Mean00:57

Weighted Mean

5.1K
While taking the arithmetic, geometric, or harmonic mean of a sample data set, equal importance is assigned to all the data points. However, all the values may not always be equally important in some data sets. An intrinsic bias might make it more important to give more weightage to specific values over others.
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
5.1K
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K
Trimmed Mean01:10

Trimmed Mean

2.9K
While measuring the mean of a data set, care needs to be taken when associating the mean to its central tendency. The same goes for the arithmetic mean, the geometric mean, or the harmonic mean. This is because the presence of a single outlier data value can significantly affect the mean. That is, the mean is sensitive to fluctuations in the data set.
Although certain measures of central tendency are not sensitive to outliers, there are alternative versions of the mean that get around the...
2.9K
Arithmetic Mean01:08

Arithmetic Mean

14.0K
The arithmetic mean is the most commonly used measure of the central tendency of a data set. It is defined as the sum of all the elements constituting the data set, divided by the total number of elements. It is sometimes loosely referred to as the “average.”
When all the values in a data set are not unique, the sum in the numerator can be calculated by multiplying each distinct value by its frequency.
Sometimes, the arithmetic mean of a sample can be affected by a few data points...
14.0K
Central Tendency: Analysis01:10

Central Tendency: Analysis

150
Measures of central tendency are tools used in biostatistics to identify the average or center of a dataset. They offer a single representative value for understanding and summarizing data distribution.
The mean is one such measure, calculated by totaling all values in a dataset and dividing by the number of values. For instance, the mean blood pressure reading (120, 130, 140, 150) would be 135. However, the mean can be affected by extreme values or outliers.
The median, another measure,...
150
Root Mean Square00:57

Root Mean Square

3.2K
If in an experiment, data values have a probability of being both positive and negative, neither the arithmetic mean, the geometric mean, nor the harmonic mean can be used to calculate the central tendency of the data set. In particular, if the positive and negative values are equally likely, the arithmetic mean is close to zero.
For example, consider the velocity of gas molecules in a container. The gas molecules are moving in different directions, which might impart positive and negative...
3.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Different Retinoid Micellar Formulations on Wound Healing: Efficacy and Collagen Structure.

Pharmaceutics·2026
Same author

HLA-DRB1*01:03 in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a genotype-phenotype association study.

The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology·2026
Same author

Sharing the spotlight: Uncovering common attentional dynamics across species.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Erratum: The DREAM Implant: A Lightweight, Modular, and Cost-Effective Implant System for Chronic Electrophysiology in Head-Fixed and Freely Behaving Mice.

Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE·2026
Same author

Controlled Semantic Cognition: Precision Recordings Converge With in Silico Experiments to Reveal the Inner Workings of the Anterior Temporal Lobe Hub.

Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Two distinct attentional priorities guide exploratory and exploitative gaze.

iScience·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2025

Induction of an Isoelectric Brain State to Investigate the Impact of Endogenous Synaptic Activity on Neuronal Excitability In Vivo
10:19

Induction of an Isoelectric Brain State to Investigate the Impact of Endogenous Synaptic Activity on Neuronal Excitability In Vivo

Published on: March 31, 2016

8.1K

What does the mean mean? A simple test for neuroscience.

Alejandro Tlaie1,2, Katharine Shapcott1, Thijs L van der Plas3

  • 1Ernst Strüngmann Institute for Neuroscience, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Plos Computational Biology
|April 19, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Trial-averaged neuronal activity metrics are common but may not reflect actual brain computation. A new test reveals these averages are relevant only when behavior is highly constrained, suggesting dynamic coding in less restricted tasks.

More Related Videos

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

14.7K
Quantifying the Heterogeneous Distribution of a Synaptic Protein in the Mouse Brain Using Immunofluorescence
09:18

Quantifying the Heterogeneous Distribution of a Synaptic Protein in the Mouse Brain Using Immunofluorescence

Published on: January 29, 2019

7.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2025

Induction of an Isoelectric Brain State to Investigate the Impact of Endogenous Synaptic Activity on Neuronal Excitability In Vivo
10:19

Induction of an Isoelectric Brain State to Investigate the Impact of Endogenous Synaptic Activity on Neuronal Excitability In Vivo

Published on: March 31, 2016

8.1K
Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

14.7K
Quantifying the Heterogeneous Distribution of a Synaptic Protein in the Mouse Brain Using Immunofluorescence
09:18

Quantifying the Heterogeneous Distribution of a Synaptic Protein in the Mouse Brain Using Immunofluorescence

Published on: January 29, 2019

7.9K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Trial-averaged metrics, such as tuning curves, are widely used to characterize neuronal activity.
  • The computational relevance of these averaged responses remains a key question in neuroscience.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and apply a test assessing the relevance of trial-averaged neuronal responses to actual neuronal processing.
  • To investigate the assumptions of reliability and behavioral relevance underlying the use of averaged metrics.

Main Methods:

  • A novel test was designed to evaluate two assumptions: response reliability and behavioral relevance of single-trial responses to average templates.
  • The test was applied to two datasets: optogenetic stimulation in mouse somatosensory cortex and electrophysiological recordings during a contrast discrimination task.

Main Results:

  • In a highly controlled experiment (Dataset 1), both reliability and behavioral relevance assumptions were largely met.
  • In a less restricted task (Dataset 2), neither assumption held, indicating trial-averaged responses were less relevant.
  • Simulations suggested response diversity, not just reliability, explained performance differences.

Conclusions:

  • Trial-averaged neuronal metrics may not accurately represent neuronal computation in tasks with less restricted behavior, where dynamic coding might prevail.
  • Researchers are encouraged to use this test to validate the computational relevance of trial-averaged neuronal metrics in their specific experimental contexts.