Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2025

05:39
Determination of the Mating Efficiency of Haploids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Published on: December 2, 2022
2.4K
Limits to selection on standing variation in an asexual population.
Nick Barton1, Himani Sachdeva2
1Institute of Science and Technology Austria, Am Campus 1, Klosterneuburg 3400, Austria.
Theoretical Population Biology
|April 21, 2024
Summary
This study models directional selection on standing genetic variation in large populations. It reveals distinct evolutionary dynamics under weak and strong selection, impacting genetic variance and fitness gain.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary genetics
- Population genetics
- Quantitative genetics
Background:
- Understanding the evolutionary response to selection on existing genetic variation is crucial.
- Previous models often focused on new mutations or recombination, neglecting standing variation.
- Directional selection drives adaptation by favoring specific trait values.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the dynamics of directional selection on standing variation in a haploid population.
- To determine how population size (N) and initial genetic variance (V0) influence evolutionary outcomes.
- To compare evolutionary trajectories under weak versus strong selection relative to genetic drift.
Main Methods:
- Mathematical modeling of a haploid population with trait values drawn from a distribution.
- Analysis of scaling limits based on the parameter NV0.
- Application of branching processes to model allele establishment under strong selection.
Main Results:
- Under weak selection (NV0≪1), genetic variance decreases exponentially, with fitness gain matching predictions for sexual populations.
- Under strong selection (NV0≫1), allele establishment is approximated by a branching process.
- Specific formulas for ultimate fitness gain are derived for Gaussian and Laplace distributions, with variance dynamics showing a t^-3 decay.
Conclusions:
- The study provides a framework for understanding selection on standing variation without new mutations.
- Distinct regimes of weak and strong selection lead to different evolutionary dynamics and outcomes.
- The findings have implications for understanding adaptation and genetic variation maintenance in natural populations.
Related Concept Videos
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift
58.4K
In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).
58.4K
Types of Selection
40.4K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
40.4K
Limits to Natural Selection
31.3K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
31.3K
Frequency-dependent Selection
22.0K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
22.0K
Genetic Drift
39.7K
Natural selection—probably the most well-known evolutionary mechanism—increases the prevalence of traits that enhance survival and reproduction. However, evolution does not merely propagate favorable traits, nor does it always benefit populations.
39.7K
Conservation of Small Populations
13.1K
Small population sizes put a species at extreme risk of extinction due to a lack of variation, and a consequent decrease in adaptability. This weakens the chances of survival under pressures such as climate change, competition from other species, or new diseases. Large populations are more likely to survive pressures such as these, as such populations are more likely to harbor individuals that have genetic variants that are adaptive under new stresses. Small populations are much less...
13.1K

